摘要
在著作权侵权纠纷案件审理中,“接触加实质性相似”被认为是认定构成侵犯著作权的一种规则。文章以东阳市乐视花儿影视公司诉蒋胜男等侵害著作权纠纷案中原、被告不同的诉辩主张所蕴含的不同思路作为切入点,结合侵权构成要件,指出“接触加实质性相似”规则仅是认定被诉侵权作品是否使用了权利作品的一种盖然性判定方法。当抗辩方提出关于权属有约定在先的合同抗辩时,意味着需要审查权利是否受到侵害这一侵权构成要件是否成立,此时应当先对合同约定的事实予以审查,权利是否受到侵害的相关事实优先于“接触加实质性相似”相关事实的确认。
In adjudicating copyright infringement disputes,"access and substantial similarity"is considered to be a rule to determine the infringement of copyright.Here,we take the different thoughts,which were contained in the proposals of plaintiff and defendant in the copyright litigation of Dongyang LETV Huaer Film&Television Company v.Jiang Shengnan,as the illustrative case.Combing with infringement constitutive elements,pointed out that the rule of"access and substantial similarity"is only a probability judgment method to determine whether the infringing activity in question used the copyrighted work or not.Once the defendant raised a defense based on a prior agreement concerning copyright ownership,which meant it was necessary to check whether the copyright has been infringed,as one of infringement constitutive elements,was established,the facts that both parties have agreed in their contract should be checked in the first place.The facts related to whether the copyrights were infringed take precedence over the confirmation of the facts of access and substantial similarity.
作者
张晓霞
张嘉艺
Zhang Xiaoxia;Zhang Jiayi
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第12期40-51,共12页
Intellectual Property
关键词
合同抗辩
侵权行为构成要件
接触加实质性相似
著作权侵权
contract defense
infringement constitutive elements
the rule of access and substantial similarity
copyright infringement
