1Jarrod M. Mohler:COMMENT:TOWARD A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF SUBSTANTIAl, SIMILARITY IN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASES, 2000 University of Cincinnati Law Review University of Cincinnati, Spring, 20006.8 U.Cin.L. Rev. 971. 被引量：1
2Sarah Brashears-Macatee. TOTAL CONCEPT AND FEEL OR DISSECTION?:APPROACHES TO TIlE MISAPPROPRIATIONTEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY, 1993 Chicago-Kent College of Law. 68 Chi. Kent L. Rev. 913. 被引量：1
3Sarah Brashears-Macatee. TOTAL CONCEPT AND FEEL OR DISSECTION?:APPROACHES TO THE MISAPPROPRIATION TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY, 1993 Chicago-Kent College of Law. 68 Chi. Kent L. Rev. 913. 被引量：1
4Lee S. Brenner: THE VERY IDEA:IN IDEA SUBMISSION CASES, MEETING THE SUBSTANT[AI. SIMILARITY TEST CARRIES A HIGH BURDEN OE PROOF, May, 2008, 31 Los Angeles Lawyer33. 被引量：1
5Nicole K. Roodhuyzen:DO WE EVEN NEED A TEST?A REEVALUATION OF ASSESSING SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY IN A COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASE, 2007 Journal of Law and Policy, 15 J.L.& Pol'y 1375. 被引量：1
6Nicole K. Roodhuyzen:DO WE EVEN NEED A TEST?A REEVALUATION OF ASSESSING SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY IN A COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASE, 2007 Journal of Law and Policy, 15 J.L.&Pol'y 1375. 被引量：1
7Nicole K. Roodhuyzen:DO WE EVEN NEED A TEST?A REEVALUATION OF ASSESSING SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY IN A COPYRIGIIT INFRINGEMENT CASE, 2007 Journal of Law and Policy, 15 J.L.& Pol'y 1375. 被引量：1
8Nicole K. Roodhuyzen:DO WE EVEN NEED A TEST?A REEVALUATION OF ASSESSING SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY IN A COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASE, 2007 Journal of Law and Policy, 15 J.L. & Pol'y 1375. 被引量：1
9Lee S. Brenner: TIlE VERY IDEA:IN IDEA SUBMISSION CASES, MEETING THE SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY TEST CARRIES A HIGH BURDEN OF PROOF, May, 2008, 31 Los Angeles Lawyer 33. 被引量：1
10Matthew R. Brodin:The Death of the Substantial Similarity Test in Digital Sampling Copyright Infringement Claims The Sixth Circuit's Flawed Attempt at a Bright Line Rule, 13 of 30, 2005 University of Minnesota Law School,Minnesota Journal of Law, Science&Technology DOCUMENTS, May, 2005,6 Minn. J.L. Sci.& Tech. 825. 被引量：1
