期刊文献+

Reducing deep learning network structure through variable reduction methods in crop modeling

原文传递
导出
摘要 Crop models are widely used to predict plant growth,water input requirements,and yield.However,existing models are very complex and require hundreds of variables to perform accurately.Due to these shortcomings,large-scale applications of crop models are limited.In order to address these limitations,reliable crop models were developed using a deep neural network(DNN)–a new approach for predicting crop yields.In addition,the number of required input variables was reduced using three common variable selection techniques:namely Bayesian variable selection,Spearman's rank correlation,and Principal Component Analysis Feature Extraction.The reduced-variableDNN modelswere capable of estimating future crop yields for 10,000,000 differentweather and irrigation scenarios while maintaining comparable accuracy levels to the original model that used all input variables.To establish clear superiority of the methodology,the results were also compared with a very recent feature selection algorithm called min-redundancy max-relevance(mRMR).The results of this study showed that the Bayesian variable selection was the best method for achieving the aforementioned goals.Specifically,the final Bayesian-based DNN model with a structure of 10 neurons in 5 layers performed very similarly(78.6%accuracy)to the original DNN cropmodel with 400 neurons in 10 layers,even though the size of the neural network was reduced by 80-fold.This effort can help promote sustainable agricultural intensifications through the large-scale application of crop models.
出处 《Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture》 2021年第1期196-207,共12页 农业人工智能(英文)
基金 supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture,Hatch project 1019654.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献52

  • 1Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6): 716-723. 被引量:1
  • 2Ardekani M R M. 2013. Off- and on-ground GPR techniques for field-scale soil moisture mapping. Geoderma, 200-201:55-66. 被引量:1
  • 3Avolio M V, Di Gregorio S, Lupiano V, et al. 2013. SCIDDICA-SS3: a new version of cellular automata model for simulating fast moving landslides. Journal of Supercomputing, 65(2): 682-696. 被引量:1
  • 4Bertoldi G, Della Chi,esa S D, Notarnicola C, et al. 2014. Estimation of soil moisture patterns in mountain grasslands by means of SAR RADARSAT2 images and hydrological modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 516: 245-257. 被引量:1
  • 5Brocca L, Morbidelli R, Melone F, et al. 2007. Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of central Italy. Journal of Hydrology, 333(2--4): 356-373. 被引量:1
  • 6Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T, et al. 2010. Spatial-temporal variability of soil moisture and its estimation across scales. Water Resources kesearch, 46(2): W02516, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008016. 被引量:1
  • 7Cervarolo G, Mendicino G, Senatore A. 2010. A coupled ecohydrological-three-dimensional unsaturated flow model describing energy, H20 and CO2 fluxes. Ecohydrology, 3(2): 205-225. 被引量:1
  • 8D'Ambrosio D, Iovin." G, Spataro W, et al. 2007. A macroscopic collisional model for debris-flows simulation. Environmental Modelling & Softgare, 22(10): 1417-1436. 被引量:1
  • 9Delbari M, Afrasiab P, Loiskandl W. 2009. Using sequential Gaussian simulation to assess the field-scale spatial uncertainty of soil water content. CATENA, 79(2): 163 169. 被引量:1
  • 10D'Odorico P, Rodrigaez-Iturbe I. 2000. Space-time self-organization of mesoscale rainfall and soil moisture. Advances in Water Resources, 23(4): 349-357. 被引量:1

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部