摘要
目的:探讨可视化椎间孔成形技术在经皮椎间孔入路内镜下椎间盘切除术(percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, PETD)治疗巨大型腰椎间盘突出症(lumbar disc herniation, LDH)中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析采用PETD治疗的67例巨大型LDH患者的病例资料,术中采用可视化椎间孔成形技术者归于可视化椎间孔成形组(31例),采用常规椎间孔成形技术者归于常规椎间孔成形组(36例)。比较2组患者术中X线透视次数、通道建立用时、手术时间、上关节突骨切除量、术后住院时间、临床综合疗效、并发症发生率、LDH复发率,以及手术前后不同时间点(术前、术后1周、术后1个月、术后3个月、末次随访时)的腰部、腿部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale, VAS)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index, ODI)。结果:(1)一般结果。可视化椎间孔成形组术中X线透视次数较常规椎间孔成形组少[(12.48±3.15)次,(23.58±7.07)次,t=-8.073,P=0.000],通道建立用时、手术时间较常规椎间孔成形组短[(21.61±6.09)min,(30.89±9.59)min,t=-4.637,P=0.000;(53.39±12.25)min,(65.31±11.76)min,t=-4.508,P=0.000],上关节突骨切除量较常规椎间孔成形组多[(0.69±0.16)cm^(3),(0.40±0.14)cm^(3),t=7.659,P=0.000];2组患者术后住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义[(3.74±1.48)d,(3.97±1.30)d,t=-0.678,P=0.500]。(2)腰部、腿部疼痛VAS评分。时间因素和分组因素均存在交互效应(F=216.417,P=0.000;F=275.367,P=0.000)。手术前后不同时间点之间腰部、腿部疼痛VAS评分的差异均有统计学意义,即均存在时间效应(F=219.335,P=0.000;F=281.412,P=0.000)。2组患者腰部、腿部疼痛VAS评分总体比较,组间差异均无统计学意义,即均不存在分组效应(F=0.016,P=0.899;F=0.258,P=0.613)。2组患者腰部、腿部疼痛VAS评分均随时间呈下降趋势,且2组的变化趋势一致[腰部疼痛VAS评分:(5.90±1.33)分,(2.52±0.72)分,(2.13±0.81)分,(1
Objective:To explore the application value of visualization foraminoplasty in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy(PETD)for treatment of giant lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Methods:The medical records of 67 patients who underwent PETD for treatment of giant LDH were analyzed retrospectively.The visualization foraminoplasty was employed during the PETD in 31 patients(visualization foraminoplasty group),and the conventional foraminoplasty was employed during the PETD in 36 ones(conventional foraminoplasty group).The intraoperative X-ray exposure, time spent in building passageway, operative time, bone resection volume of superior articular process(SAP),postoperative hospital stay, clinical outcome, incidence rate of postoperative complication, recurrence rate of LDH as well as the lumbago-leg pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score and Oswestry disability index(ODI)measured before the PETD,on week 1,month 1,month 3 after the PETD and at the last follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.Results:(1)The intraoperative X-ray exposure was fewer, the time spent in building passageway and operative time were shorter, the bone resection volume of SAP was larger in visualization foraminoplasty group compared to conventional foraminoplasty group(12.48±3.15 vs 23.58±7.07 times, t=-8.073,P=0.000;21.61±6.09 vs 30.89±9.59 minutes, t=-4.637,P=0.000;53.39±12.25 vs 65.31±11.76 minutes, t=-4.508,P=0.000;0.69±0.16 vs 0.40±0.14 cm(3),t=7.659,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in postoperative hospital stays between the 2 groups(3.74±1.48 vs 3.97±1.30 days, t=-0.678,P=0.500).(2)There was interaction between time factor and group factor in lumbago-leg pain VAS score(F=216.417,P=0.000;F=275.367,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in lumbago-leg pain VAS scores between different timepoints before and after the PETD,in other words, there was time effect(F=219.335,P=0.000;F=281.412,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in lumbago-leg pain VAS scores between the 2 groups in general, in other words
作者
翟亚业
秦晓彬
孟祥翔
张超远
ZHAI Yaye;QIN Xiaobin;MENG Xiangxiang;ZHANG Chaoyuan(Nanyang Central Hospital,Nanyang 473003,Henan,China)
出处
《中医正骨》
2022年第1期22-27,77,共7页
The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology
关键词
椎间盘移位
腰椎
椎间盘切除术
内窥镜
intervertebral disc displacement
lumbar vertebrae
diskectomy
endoscopes
