期刊文献+

21世纪以来美国绩效标准本位教师教育改革的动向与反思 被引量:1

Trends of the Performance Standard-Based Teacher Education in America Since the 21st Century and Its Reflection
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国绩效标准本位教师教育起源于20世纪六七十年代盛行的表现/能力本位教师教育。绩效标准本位教师教育以绩效主义和建构主义为理论基础,重新阐释了教师活动的对象、内容、主体和教师教育评价,形成了以中小学学生为中心的教师专业发展观、以教育增值为取向的教师教育质量观,在一定程度上推动了美国教师教育的发展。但在联邦政府高度重视绩效的背景下,美国教师教育政策愈来愈趋向绩效化、技术化和标准化,使其教师教育在追求学生成绩和促进学生发展、技术主义和人文主义、标准化和多样化之间出现失衡。 The performance standard-based teacher education(PSBTE)in America originates from the performance/competency-based teacher education,which prevailed in the 1960s and 1970s.Based on the theory of performancism and constructivism,PSBTE re-interprets the object,content,subject of teachers’activity and evaluation of teacher education,and forms the views,which takes the elementary school students as the center of teacher professional development and takes the value-added assessment as the guideline of teacher education quality.To a certain extent,it promotes the development of American teacher education.However,as the federal government attaching much importance to performance,the teacher education policies become more and more performance-oriented,technology-focused and standardized,which results in the imbalance between students’achievement and students’development,technicalism and humanism,and standardization and diversification.
作者 蒋喜锋 刘小强 JIANG Xi-feng;LIU Xiao-qiang(School of Education,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第8期99-106,共8页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 江西省社会科学规划项目(19JY09)。
关键词 美国 教师教育 绩效标准本位 the U.S. teacher education performance standards-based
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献100

  • 1曾荣光.从教育质量到质量教育的议论——香港特区的经验与教训[J].北京大学教育评论,2006,4(1):129-144. 被引量:38
  • 2Lasswell, H.D. (1980). Harold D. Lasswell on Political Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Lasswell, H.D. (1951). "Policy Orientation. " in D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell (Eds.) The Policy Sciences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press,10. 被引量:1
  • 4deleon, P. ( 1988 ). Advice and consent: The development of the policy sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 被引量:1
  • 5Yanow, D. ( 2000 ). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oak : Sage Publications, 17. 被引量:1
  • 6Easton, D. ( 1953 ). The political system, an inquiry into the state of political science. New York: Knopf, 129. 被引量:1
  • 7Kant, I. (1961). Critique of pure reason. New York: St. Martin Press,9. 被引量:1
  • 8Hoy, D.C. and T. McCarthy (1994). Critical theory. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press,9. 被引量:1
  • 9Horkhiemer, M. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum. ( Original work published in 1944) 被引量:1
  • 10Foucauh, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon. (Original work published in 1975). 被引量:1

共引文献64

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部