摘要
司法机关对“从严从重”刑事政策的理解存在误区,导致在涉疫情案件处理过程中出现“从严从重”的适用异化:在定罪上,“从严从重”异化为主客观标准的降低及兜底条款的偏向适用;在量刑上,“从严从重”所处理的案件忽视了“禁止重复评价”等其他法律原则。应匡正这些误区,将“从严从重”视为“宽严相济”的“子原则”,在严格把握犯罪认定标准的前提下,结合犯罪行为所侵犯的法益类别及数量、犯罪阶段、主观动机等具体评估行为人的社会危害性及人身危险性,进而精准适用相关罪名,严格把握从重范围。
Judicial organs have misunderstanding in the criminal policy of"strictness and severity",which leads to alienation of its application in the process of dealing with pandemic cases.?In terms of conviction,the"strictness and severity"alienation means lower subjective and objective standards and the biased application of the comprehensive clauses.In terms of sentencing,the cases processed with"strictness and severity"have ignored other legal principles such as"prohibiting repeated evaluation".And we should correct the abovementioned misunderstandings,treat"strictness and severity"as the sub-principle of"balancing leniency and severity".On the premise of strictly grasping the crime identification standards,the social harm and personal danger of the perpetrator are evaluated in combination with the categories of legal interests violated by the criminal act,criminal stage and subjective motivation,and then the relevant charges are accurately applied and the severity scope is strictly grasped.
出处
《医学与法学》
2021年第5期24-29,共6页
Medicine and Jurisprudence
基金
中国法学会2020年度部级法学研究课题“涉公共卫生突发事件犯罪的刑法治理体系完善研究”[项目编号:CLS(2020)ZX026]的阶段性成果。
关键词
从严从重
刑事政策
宽严相济
禁止重复评价
罪刑法定
strictness and severity
criminal policy
balancing leniency and severity
repeat evaluation prohibition
statutory crime and penalty
