期刊文献+

公众认同、政治抉择与死刑控制 被引量:117

公众认同、政治抉择与死刑控制
原文传递
导出
摘要 限制和废除死刑已经成为席卷全球的当代刑事政策运动与刑罚改革潮流。死刑的存废、去留 ,并不取决于其自身无法辩明的正义性 (或非正义性 )以及无法证实或证伪的威慑性。它在根本上是一个受集体意识的公众认同以及政治领袖的政治意志左右的政策选择问题。集体意识对死刑的广泛认同为死刑制度提供了正当性和合法性资源 ,但集体意识具有两面性 ,是交织着理智与情感、意识与潜意识、理性与非理性、正义与非正义的矛盾统一体。政治领袖要尊重与反映民意 ,更应当善解与引导民意 ,运用政治智慧 ,作出科学的死刑决策 ,使死刑政策。 It has become a global tide to limit and abolish the death penalty in modern criminal policy movement. The preservation or the abolition of the death penalty doesn't rely on the justice/injustice or the overawing of itself, which are unable to be argued clearly. Rather, this is an issue of policy choice decided substantially by the public recognition of collective consciousness and the political will of political leaders. The general recognition of collective consciousness has provides legitimate resource to the death penalty, yet the collective consciousness is a contradictory being with 2 sides, such as sense and sensibility, conscious and sub-conscious, rationality and irrationality, justice and injustice interlaced. Political leaders should respect and reflect the public opinions, still, be good at understanding and leading public opinions, thus to make scientific decisions about death penalty with their political wisdoms, making the death penalty policy, death penalty system and the application of death penalty become a rational practice and a practical rationality.
作者 梁根林
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期15-27,共13页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 公众认同 政治抉择 死刑控制 重刑主义 刑事政策 集体意识 collective consciousness, public recognition, political choice, death penalty control
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Amnesty International Website Against the Death Penalty Abohtionist and Retentionist Countries. See http://www. web.amnesty. org/rmp/dphbrary. 被引量:1
  • 2Hans-Jurgen Kerner, Public Opinion on Death Penalty in Germany, Allensbach Yearbook of Demoscopy, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 3Furman v. Georgia,408, U. S. 238 (1972). 被引量:1
  • 4Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976). 被引量:1
  • 5Gallup Poll Release, 2/24/2000. 被引量:1
  • 6Hugo Adam Bedau, The Case Against The Death Penalty, http://archive. aclu. org/library/case-against-death.html. 被引量:1
  • 7Marinne LOschnig - Gspandl and Michael Killchiling, Victim/Offender Mediation and Victim Compensation in Austria and Germany - Stocktaking and Perspectives for Future Research, Europe Journal of Crime,Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 1997 - 1. 被引量:1
  • 8Bernd - Dieter Meier, Restorative justice - a new paradigm in criminal law?Europe Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 1998 - 2. 被引量:1
  • 9Joshua Micah Marshall (American Prospect), "Death in Venice," New Republic, July 31, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 10Joshua Micah Marshall (American Prospect), "'Death in Venice " New Republic, July 31, 2000.See also from: David Anderson, The Death Penalty - a Defence, http://w1. 155.teha.com/u15509119. 被引量:1

二级参考文献1

共引文献295

同被引文献1455

引证文献117

二级引证文献598

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部