摘要
2018年《行诉法解释》第106条确立了一事不再理原则的适用范围,并借鉴《民诉法解释》第247条之规定,以当事人、诉讼标的与诉讼请求"三同说"作为重复起诉的判断标准。因新旧司法解释中使用的"重复起诉"的概念内含不同,导致新司法解释中的第106条与(沿用旧司法解释的)第69条存在概念错位和逻辑冲突。基于法律规范的统一性要求和行政诉讼制度精细化发展的需要,应当将该司法解释第69条第6项中的"重复起诉"修改为"已存在诉讼系属的"。行政诉讼中以诉讼标的作为重复起诉的客观判断标准缺乏坚实的法教义学基础。为统一判断标准,建议参照行政诉讼的法定起诉条件,以案件事实取代诉讼标的,确立当事人同一、案件事实同一、诉讼请求同一的重复起诉判断标准。
Article 106 of the“Interpretation of Administrative Litigation Law”issued in 2018 establishes the scope of application of the principle of Ne Bis In Idem,and uses the parties,subject matter and litigation request as the judgment criterion for repeated prosecution.Due to the difference in the concept of“repeated Lawsuit”used in the old and new judicial interpretation of the Administrative Litigation Law,there is a conceptual misalignment and logical conflict between article 106 and article 69.The“repeated Lawsuit”in Article 69,paragraph 6 should be modified to“existed in the lawsuit”.In order to unify the judicial application,it is recommended to refer to the prosecution conditions in Article 49 of the Administrative Litigation Law,replace the“subject matter of litigation”with“case facts”,and establish the same litigation standards for the same parties,the same facts and the same claims.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第5期111-120,共10页
Law Review
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目“行政诉讼判决效力理论与实证研究”(项目编号:16CFX020)的阶段性成果。
关键词
行政诉讼
一事不再理
重复起诉
诉讼系属
既判力
Administrative litigation
Ne Bis In Idem
Repeated Lawsuit
Litigation Affiliation
Res Judicata
