摘要
目的:探究连续性个性化助产模式对初产妇分娩疼痛及母婴结局的影响。方法:选择2019年7月至2019年12月在沈阳市和平区妇婴医院分娩的86例初产妇为研究对象,依据随机数字表法,随机将其分为两组—α组和β组(每组43例)。α组采用连续性个性化助产模式分娩,β组初产妇接受传统助产模式分娩,比较两组初产妇的分娩疼痛情况、母婴结局和护理满意度。结果:α组在产后2h、产后12h和产后24h的疼痛数字评分法(NRS)得分均低于β组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);α组的自然分娩率高于β组,难产率、新生儿窒息率、产后出血率均低于β组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);α组的护理满意度为95.35%,高于β组(81.40%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在初产妇分娩过程中,给予连续性个性化助产模式能够缓解产妇疼痛情况,改善母婴结局,产妇满意度理想。
Objective:To explore the effect of continuous individualized midwifery mode on delivery pain and maternal and infant outcomes in primiparas.Methods:A total of 86 primiparas who delivered in Heping District Women and Infant Hospital of Shenyang City from July 2019 to December 2019 were selected as the research objects,according to the random number table method,they were randomly divided into two groups-groupαand groupβ(43 cases in each group).In group A,continuous individualized midwifery was used,the primiparas in groupβreceived traditional midwifery mode.The delivery pain,maternal and infant outcomes and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results:The NRS scores of groupαwere lower than that of groupβat 2h,12h and 24h after delivery,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the natural delivery rate of groupαwas higher than that of groupβ,the rate of dystocia,neonatal asphyxia and postpartum hemorrhage were lower than that of groupβ(P<0.05);the nursing satisfaction of groupαwas 95.35%,higher than that of groupβ(81.40%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the process of primipara delivery,continuous personalized midwifery mode can alleviate maternal pain,improve maternal and infant outcomes,maternal satisfaction is ideal.
作者
韩璐
Han Lu(Heping District Women and Infant Hospital,Shenyang Liaoning,110005,China)
出处
《中外女性健康研究》
2021年第16期8-9,共2页
Women＇s Health Research
关键词
初产妇
连续性个性化助产模式
分娩疼痛
母婴结局
助产效果
Primipara
Continuous individualized midwifery mode
Delivery pain
Maternal and infant outcomes
Midwifery effect
