摘要
基于世界知识产权组织WIPO…Lex数据库的知识产权法律文本和欧盟知识产权局数据库的知识产权诉讼案例数据,针对中欧班列沿线英国、德国、荷兰、波兰、意大利5个国家的规则类知识产权政策,从政策保护力度定量化分级、政策执行重点及其演变历程、知识产权诉讼案例特征及热点等方面开展政策趋势和诉讼风险研究。结果表明:(1)英国政策的数量和力度都居五国之首,荷兰的政策数量最低但其政策保护力度相对较高;(2)在政策颁布主体上,各国均涉及多家机构,且大量适用了欧盟理事会和欧洲议会的相关知识产权政策;(3)各国在版权与相关权利、知识产权相关法律的执行、知识产权监管机构等领域均具有较强的政策力度;(4)欧盟商标是五国知识产权诉讼重要领域,其中诉讼案件赔偿金额最大值最高的为英国、最低的为荷兰,最大值和最小值差额居五国之首的为德国,而“侵权”“混淆可能性”等是各国诉讼案件普遍涉及的主题。根据研究结果,建议中国有关企业注意根据目标国家的司法体系差异,充分了解其知识产权法律法规和司法实践及其沿用的欧盟法律法规,制定综合性及体系性的知识产权布局策略,做好法律风险评估和采取规避措施,并注意了解在目标市场开展知识产权诉讼的基本策略和技巧,构建全方位的知识产权保护体系。
Based on the intellectual property(IP)law texts of the WIPO Lex database and the intellectual property litigation case data of the European Union Intellectual Property Office(EUIPO)database,aiming at the rule-based IP policies promulgated by the United Kingdom(UK),Germany,the Netherlands,Poland,and Italy along the China-Europe railway line,this paper studies IP policy trends and litigation risks in terms of the quantitative classification of policy protection,policy implementation focus and its evolution,IP litigation case characteristics and hot spots.The results show that:(1)British policy ranks first in number and strength in the five countries,the Netherlands has the lowest number of policies but has a relatively high policy protection.(2)In terms of policy promulgation agencies,all countries are involved many agencies,and a large number of relevant IP policies of the European Council and the European Parliament have been applied.(3)The five countries have strong policies in the fields of copyright and relevant rights,the implementation of intellectual property related laws,intellectual property regulatory agencies and other fields.(4)EU trademark litigations are the important area of IP litigations in the five countries,among them,the highest amount of compensation in litigation cases is in the UK and the lowest in the Netherlands,Germany tops the highest and lowest difference among the five countries,and"infringement"and"likelihood of confusion"are the topics commonly involved in litigation cases in various countries.Based on the results,the paper suggests that relevant Chinese enterprises pay attention to the differences in judicial system of the target countries,fully understand their intellectual property laws and regulations and EU laws and regulations,formulate comprehensive and systematic intellectual property layout strategy,make legal risk assessment and take avoidance measures,and understand the basic strategies and skills of intellectual property litigation in the target market,thus build a compre
作者
张娴
许轶
朱月仙
冯婷婷
刘思晗
黄玉茹
Zhang Xian;Xu Yi;Zhu Yuexian;Feng Tingting;Liu Sihan;Huang Yuru(Intellectual Property Research&Consultation Center(IPRCC),Chengdu Library and Information Center,Chinese Academy of Science,Chengdu 610041,China;School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;School of Public Administration,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610064,China)
出处
《科技管理研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第14期191-202,共12页
Science and Technology Management Research
基金
四川省省级知识产权专项资金项目“中欧班列(蓉欧快铁)沿线国家知识产权政策风险研究”(2018-BH-00009)。
关键词
知识产权保护
知识产权政策
知识产权风险
知识产权诉讼
风险评估
intellectual property protection
intellectual property policy
intellectual property risk
intellectual property litigation
risk assessment
