摘要
法典观可以分为理想主义、保守主义与折衷主义三种类型,我国应当采取折衷主义的法典观;根据法典的基本特征,我国1979年通过的与1997年修订的《中华人民共和国刑法》均为刑法典,我国刑法已经法典化。不能采取理想主义法典观,不应继续采取统一刑法典立法模式;统一刑法典立法模式表面上没有肢解刑法典,但实际上肢解了诸多刑法规范(有关行政犯的刑法规范的内容部分存在于刑法典中、部分散在于其他法律中);事实表明,对刑法规范的肢解导致行刑衔接相当困难,极不利于刑法规范的适用;刑事立法应当逐步过渡到多元立法模式,特别是应当在行政法、经济法等法律中直接规定行政犯的构成要件与法定刑。目前不宜全面修订刑法典,当务之急是在其他法律中规定行政犯(包括刑法典已有规定的行政犯),从而为将来全面修订刑法典创造条件;刑法修正案的立法方式并非只能对刑法典进行个别或局部修改,而是可以在刑法典中增加或者删除部分章节,从而进行大量修改与重要修改。
The idea of codifi cation can be divided into three types which are idealism,conservatism and eclecticism.Among these types,we shall adopt the idea of eclecticism of codifi cation.According to the basic characteristics of the code,both the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China passed in 1979 and the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China amended in 1997 are all criminal codes.In other words,our Criminal Law has been codifi ed.However,we cannot adopt the idea of idealism of codifi cation and continue to adopt the legislative model of a unifi ed criminal code.On the surface,the legislative model of a unifi ed criminal code does not disintegrate the criminal code,but in fact it disintegrates numerous criminal norms in other laws,for example,the criminal norms concerning the administrative of fenses are partly prescribed in the criminal code and partly scattered in other laws.It has been demonstrated that such disintegration has led to the di ffi cult of the regulatory coherence of the administrative punishment and the criminal punishment,which is extremely disadvantageous to the application of the criminal norms.The legislation model of criminal norms should be gradually transferred from a unifi ed criminal code to diversifi ed criminal norms.In particular,the constitutive elements and statutory punishment of administrative of fenses should be directly stipulated in the administrative law,the economic law and so on.Currently,it is not the right time to make comprehensive amendments to the Criminal Law.However,it is urgent to stipulate administrative of fences in other laws,those administrative of fences already stipulated in the Criminal Law shall be included,so as to provide conditions to make comprehensive amendments to the Criminal Law in the future.The legislative mode of amendments is not only to make individual or partial amendments to the Criminal Law,but also can add or delete some chapters or sections in the Criminal Law,thus to make extensive amendments and major amendments.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期3-17,共15页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
刑法修正案
刑法法典化
法典类型
统一刑法典模式
多元立法模式
Amendments to the Criminal Law
Codifi cation of the Criminal Law
Legislative Model
Unifi ed Criminal Code
Diversifi ed Criminal Norms
