摘要
缺乏逻辑性的罪名设置与不合理的罪状设定致使反恐罪名体系出现罪名缺乏个性、逻辑外延过于交叉与重合等多重缺憾。在未来重构反恐罪名体系时,应当重视平衡事前预防与自由保障、兼顾现实需要与体系科学以及罪状的科学性,将强制他人穿戴宣扬恐怖主义服饰、标志罪移至刑法分则第四章,删除非法持有宣扬恐怖主义物品罪,在宣扬恐怖主义罪中增设特别条款用于规制为宣扬恐怖主义而持有相关物品的行为。在罪名体系重构前,应采取限制刑罚范围的解释立场:反恐罪名属于倾向犯,只有当行为表现出恐怖主义倾向时才构成犯罪;反恐罪名之间的交叉不属于法条竞合;当后续犯罪行为系用于说明组织、领导、参加时,原则上仅成立组织、领导、参加恐怖主义组织罪一罪而不宜认定数罪。
Lack of logical setting of charges and unreasonable setting of charges have led to multiple shortcomings in the anti-terrorism charges system,such as lack of personality,excessive overlap and overlap of logical extensions,and so on.Reconstructing the anti-terrorism crime system should pay attention to balancing pre-prevention and freedom protection,taking into account practical needs,system science,and the scientific nature of crimes.The crime of forcing others to wear clothing and signs that promote terrorism is moved to Chapter 4 of the Criminal Law.In the crime of promoting terrorism,the crime of illegally possessing items that promote terrorism is deleted,and special provisions are added to regulate the possession of related items for the purpose of promoting terrorism.Before the restructuring of the crime system,an explanatory stand that limits the scope of the penalty should be adopted:anti-terrorism crimes belong to a tendency to crime and only constitute a crime when the behavior is manifested;crosses between anti-terrorism crimes do not belong to the coincidence of legal provisions;when subsequent crimes are committed used to explain that when organizing,leading,and participating,in principle,only one crime is convicted and it is not appropriate to convict multiple crimes.
作者
陈小彪
刘锋
Chen Xiaobiao;Liu Feng(Southwest University of Political Science&Law,Chongqing 401120)
出处
《警学研究》
2021年第3期16-29,共14页
Police Science Research
基金
国家社科基金项目“文化安全的刑法保护研究”研究成果,项目编号:16BFX062。
关键词
反恐罪名体系
事前预防
倾向犯
体系重构
司法应对
anti-terrorism accusation system
advance prevention
criminaloid
system reconstruction
judicial response
