摘要
裁判文书上网是司法公开的一项重要举措,有助于社会公众知情权的实现。然而,上网的裁判文书中存在一些个人信息容易被他人不当利用。对此,虽然最高人民法院出台了《关于人民法院在互联网公布裁判文书的规定》,借以规范裁判文书上网,减少个人信息被曝光的几率。但是,由于对社会公众知情权的偏重,在上网的裁判文书中个人信息保护的力度并不尽如人意,终使信息权利人的利益难以得到完整保护。因此,必须在裁判文书上网与个人信息保护之间重新作出衡平。在《民法典》强调个人信息使用必要性的语境下,衡平应以必要性原则为引导,适当侧重个人信息的保护,在上网的裁判文书中删除不必要的个人信息,以使社会公众知情权和个人信息都能得到最大化保护。
Referee documents online is an important measure of judicial disclosure, which helps the realization of the public’s right to know.However, there are some personal information in the judgment documents on the Internet, these personal information are easy to be used improperly by others.In this regard, although the Supreme People’s Court issued the“Regulations on the Publication of Judgment Documents by the People’s Courts on the Internet”to regulate the online judgment documents, reducing the chance of personal information being exposed.However, due to the emphasis on the public’s right to know, the strength of personal information protection online judgment documents is not satisfactory, which makes it difficult for the rights of information rights holders to be fully protected.Therefore, it is necessary to rebalance the online judgment and personal information protection.In the context of the Civil Code emphasizing the necessity of using personal information, equity can be guided by the principle of necessity, with an appropriate focus on the protection of personal information, unnecessary personal information should be deleted from the online judgment documents, and then give the public the right to know and personal information can be maximized protection.
作者
张融
ZHANG Rong(School of Law,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541004,China)
出处
《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第4期71-76,共6页
Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
基金
2020年广西壮族自治区中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2020KY02004)。
关键词
裁判文书上网
知情权
个人信息
referee documents online
right to know
personal information
