期刊文献+

面部创口或瘢痕的法医学鉴定

Forensic identification of facial wounds or scars
原文传递
导出
摘要 《人体轻伤鉴定标准(试行)》(以下简称老《标准》)中创口和瘢痕的鉴定一直存在争议,《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》(以下简称《标准》)并没有彻底解决这些争议。以一例典型案例展开论述,梳理面部损伤的基本概念、争议条款和鉴定时限。总结常见合理的医源性扩创情形,给《〈人体损伤程度鉴定标准〉适用指南》(以下简称《指南》)做了适当补充。此外,还以案例形式分享了头面部跨部位损伤的处理方法,旨在为面部损伤的争议案件提供参考。 The identification of wounds and scars in the Identification Standards for Human Minor Injuries(Trial)has been controversial.The Identification Standards for Human Injury Degrees have resolved some of the disputes since its promulgation,but still some problems have not been resolved.This article discussed with a typical case,sorting out the basic concepts,controversial clauses,and identification time limits of facial injuries.This article summarized common and reasonable iatrogenic expansion scenarios,and made appropriate supplements to the Applicable Guidelines for the Identification Standards of Human Injury Degree.In addition,this article shared the treatment of head and face cross-facial injuries in the form of cases,aiming to provide a reasonable solution for controversial cases of facial injuries.
作者 王森 曾琼峰 Wang Sen;Zeng Qiongfeng(Department of Forensic Medicine,Guangxi Medical University Nanning530021,China;School of Basic Medicine,Guangxi Medical University Nanning530021,China;Judicial Appraisal Center of Xiangya Second Hospital of Central South University,Changsha410011,China)
出处 《中国卫生法制》 2021年第4期130-132,共3页 China Health Law
关键词 瘢痕 鉴定时限 跨面部损伤 Wounds Scars Identification time limit Cross-facial injuries
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1司法部司法鉴定管理局组织编写..《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》适用指南[M].北京:法律出版社,2013:305.
  • 2张华坤,王敏,罗开,郑之峻,江嵬.三庭五眼的最佳定点探索[J].医学与哲学(B),2017,38(5):64-69. 被引量:9
  • 3赵子琴主编..法医病理学 第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:472.
  • 4朱世峰,马明峰,申迪,陈亚杰.体表软组织创口造作性扩创1例[J].中国法医学杂志,2019,34(5):514-514. 被引量:1
  • 5步宏,李一雷..病理学 本科临床 配增值 第9版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.

二级参考文献1

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部