摘要
史学碎片化的产生有其话语根源。海登·怀特的历史书写理论揭示了史学文本的双重话语结构,即显性结构和隐性结构,并认为历史书写实际上就是一种语言操作活动,史学文本就是一则隐喻,得出“史学若文学”结论。实际上,海登·怀特的历史书写理论必然会导致极端的碎片化状态。而通过对以乔治·莱考夫和保罗·利科为代表的当代隐喻理论的分析,发现怀特的历史书写理论完全割裂了隐喻与真实之间的联系,是对主流隐喻理论的一种阉割。对于如何有效地克服极端的史学碎片化,现代唯物史观提供了重要的思想启迪,它可以从逻辑的根基处,即历史本体论和认识论层面,阻断极端碎片化的生成机制。
The fragmentation of historiography has its origin of discourse.Hayden White's theory of historical writing which reveals the dual discourse structures of historical texts,namely explicit structures,and hidden structures.In addition,it holds that Historical Writing is actually a kind of language operation activities and historical text is a metaphor and draws the conclusion that“Historiography basically equals to Literature”.In fact,Hayden White's theory inevitably leads to extreme fragmentation.By analyzing the contemporary metaphor theories in terms of George Lakoff and Paul Ricoeur,it is found that White's theory castrates the mainstream metaphor theory because it completely separates the relationship between metaphor and reality.For effectively overcoming the extreme fragmentation,Modern Concept of Historical Materialism provides some important enlightenments,which can block the generating mechanism of extreme fragmentation at the level of historical ontology and epistemology.
作者
王志华
WANG Zhihua(Jinggangshan University,Ji’an,Jiangxi 343009,China)
出处
《龙岩学院学报》
2021年第3期101-107,共7页
Journal of Longyan University
基金
2016年度江西省高校人文社会科学规划一般项目“史学碎片化的困境及出路——唯物史观的视角”(ZX161001)。
关键词
海登·怀特
史学碎片化
隐喻的真实
现代唯物史观
Hayden White
fragmentation of historiography
truth of metaphor
modern concepts of Historical Materialism
