摘要
目的对GB 10136—2015《食品安全国家标准动物性水产制品》进行标准跟踪评价,为标准的修订提供参考。方法整理和分析2018年1月至2020年10月企业人员、监管人员、检验(检测)人员和行业协会/科研院校反馈的专项调查问卷中对标准的反馈意见和实施效果,不同调查对象实施效果量化评分资料采用统计学描述和检验进行分析;反馈意见和建议分别从填写人员职业、意见反馈内容两个维度进行细分编码,采用构成指标进行统计描述分析,评价结果的比较采用统计学检验分析。结果共发放问卷220份,回收182份(82.73%,182/220),有效问卷171份(77.73%,171/220)。不同调查对象的问卷回收率和有效应答率差异均有统计学意义(χ^(2)=28.359,P<0.05;χ^(2)=24.112,P<0.05);从反馈意见内容分析:共收集到意见和建议208条,涉及科学性的占77.88%(162/208),可行性和协调性上分别占11.54%(24/208)和10.58%(22/208);其中企业人员反馈109条(52.40%)、检验(检测)人员反馈49条(23.56%)、监管人员反馈37条(17.79%)、行业协会/科研院校反馈13条(6.25%),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=64.119,P<0.05)。从实施效果评价分析:不同调查对象对健康需求(H=32.302)、产业发展(H=28.394)、监管需求(H=29.070)、文本结构(H=18.903)和应用范围(H=8.382)的合理性的评分结果差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);企业人员、监管人员和行业协会/科研院校的评分在3.50~5.00分,检验(检测)人员的评分在3.00~4.50分。结论调查对象着重关注点在标准的"术语与定义""指标设置"等科学性,可基于评价内容和指标的基础上结合现场调研和专家咨询的内容,作为对该标准跟踪评价的补充和佐证。
Objective The National Food Safety Standard for Animal Derived Aquatic Products(GB 10136-2015)was evaluated to provide reference for the revision of the standard.Methods Feedback and implementation effect from enterprises,inspection agencies,industry associations and scientific research institutions were collected and analyzed through questionnaire from January 2018 to October 2020.The quantitative score data of implementation effect of different survey objects were analyzed by statistical description and test;feedback and suggestions were subdivided and coded from the two dimensions of filling in personnel occupation and feedback content,and the constituent indicators was analyzed by statistical description,and the comparison of evaluation results was analyzed by statistical test.Results A total of 220 special follow-up evaluation questionnaires were sent out and 182 questionnaires were recovered,of which 171 were valid.The overall recovery rate was 82.73%(182/220)and the effective response rate was 77.73%(171/220).The results showed that there were significant differences in the recovery rate and the effective response rate among different respondents(χ^(2)=28.359,P<0.05;χ^(2)=24.112,P<0.05).Content analysis of feedback:208 opinions and suggestions were collected,of which 77.88%(162/208)were about scientific issue,11.54%(24/208)were about feasibility and 10.58%(22/208)were about coordination.The feedback from enterprises accounted for 52.40%of all the respondents,followed by 49(23.56%)from inspection agencies,37(17.79%)from supervisors,and 13(6.25%)from industry associations/scientific research institutions,and the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=64.119,P<0.05).Analysis of implementation effect:from the result of health demand(H=32.302),industrial development(H=28.394),regulatory demand(H=29.070),text structure(H=18.903)and application scope(H=8.382),the differences of scores of different respondents were statistically significant(P<0.05).The score of enterprises,supervisors and industry assoc
作者
夏追平
吴媛
顾仲朝
石善波
梅宏舟
XIA Zhuiping;WU Yuan;GU Zhongchao;SHI Shanbo;MEI Hongzhou(Zhoushan Agency for Public Health Inspection,Zhejiang Zhoushan 316022,China)
出处
《中国食品卫生杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2021年第1期104-109,共6页
Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene
关键词
食品安全标准
跟踪评价
动物性水产制品
反馈
Food safety standards
follow-up evaluation
animal derived aquatic products
feedback
