摘要
法官裁量分配证明责任在原《民事证据规定》第7条删除之后,已从我国立法体系中消失。法律要件分类说明确了证明责任分配的法定化,这虽然在一定程度上限制了法官自由裁量权在证明责任分配领域的适用,但在充分了解法官自由裁量权、证明责任分配体系和我国司法实践情况后,可以明确法官裁量分配证明责任的必要性,应在肯定其在证明责任分配体系中的"兜底"性作用的基础上完善法官在民事证明责任分配中的自由裁量权。
After the deletion of Article 7 of the original provisions on civil evidence,the discretionary burden of proof has disappeared from China’s legislative system.The classification of legal elements confirms the legalization of the distribution of burden of proof,which restricts the application of the discretion of judges in the field of distribution of burden of proof to a certain extent.But after fully understanding the discretion of judges,the distribution system of burden of proof and the judicial practice in our country,it can be clear that the distribution of burden of proof by discretion of judges is necessary.The discretion of the judge should be improved in the distribution of civil burden of proof on the basis of affirming the"covering the bottom"of the burden of proof distribution system.
作者
王晓牛
WANG Xiaoniu(School of law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,China 200050)
出处
《昆明学院学报》
2021年第2期44-49,83,共7页
Journal of Kunming University
关键词
民事诉讼
证明责任
分配
法官自由裁量权
civil procedure
burden of proof
distribution
discretion of judge
