期刊文献+

新国家空间框架解读中国空间转型现象的再审视 被引量:9

Reexamining the explanation of China’s spatial transformation from the perspective of new state space framework
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为全球化背景下城市与区域空间转型的主流理论框架,新国家空间(New State Space, NSS)框架已被国内学者应用于诠释中国国家空间重构过程。论文梳理了NSS框架的提出背景、重要概念、主要观点以及国内外相关研究成果,发现NSS框架虽能为碎片化的全球空间治理研究提供一个统一的分析视角与平台,但却可能因概念泛化且缺乏可证伪性、框架固化而难以捕捉繁复情境、复杂化现象问题等潜在缺陷而引发理论本体模糊。同时,中国存在特殊的国土空间行政结构、政府间关系、所有制安排、地方官员晋升机制以及市场经济发展路径,基于欧美背景的NSS框架难以准确解析中国的本地化场景。此外,国内学界对NSS框架涉及的概念术语尚缺乏必要的辨析,在某种程度上存在对本土现象的机械化解读,可能导致难以深入探究多尺度国家空间转型的实际过程与底层逻辑,不能实现国内外学界的深度学术对话,进而无法掌握改革开放以来中国空间转型研究领域的话语权。未来有必要重新审视NSS框架的内涵外延,理性解读中国空间转型的实践,力争以本土化实践为基础,构建更具普适性的理论框架来兼容不同国家的情境,在国际上发出中国学者的声音。 New state space(NSS) framework is the main theoretical framework to explain urban and regional spatial transformation under the background of globalization. Researchers in China have introduced NSS to interpret China’s spatial reconfiguration process in recent years. This study reviewed the background, key concepts, main ideas, and research findings of NSS in China and internationally, revealing that NSS can provide a unified perspective to analyze global spatial transformation. However, some defects of NSS would lead to serious ontological problems. First, the concepts of NSS have a tendency of generalization, meanwhile, are lack of falsifiability;second, the lack of flexibility of the framework is hard to capture multifaceted situations;third,NSS may complicate the real-world scenarios sometimes, which would go against the intention of theorization.China has unique national spatial administrative structures, governmental relationship, property right arrangement, promotion system of officials, and market economy development path, therefore NSS may run into difficulties to articulate the intricate Chinese contexts because it was proposed based on the background of Western scenarios. That is to say, there are limitations in using NSS to interpret China’s spatial transformation—the differences of territorial administrative framework between China and Western countries may lead to correspondence problems of terms and concepts. Different property right arrangement could result in different dimensions of analysis in spatial restructuring. Finally, the complicated power field in China would have different internal driving forces in the process of regional and urban transformation. These problems would result in dilemmas when discussing and exploring the multiple-scalar practical situations and the underlying logic of state spatial transformation. Further, it would be difficult for Chinese academia to engage in in-depth academic exchanges with scholars from other countries, and to have their voice heard in the the
作者 匡贞胜 孙斌栋 KUANG Zhensheng;SUN Bindong(Research Center for China Administrative Division,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China;School of Urban and Regional Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China;Institute of Eco-Chongming,Shanghai 202162,China;Future City Lab,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)
出处 《地理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第3期511-523,共13页 Progress in Geography
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA068)。
关键词 新国家空间 尺度 国家空间选择性 行政区划 空间转型 new state space scale state spatial selectivity administrative division spatial transformation
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

二级参考文献480

同被引文献282

引证文献9

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部