期刊文献+

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者居家肺康复需求问卷的编制及信效度检验 被引量:2

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A HOME-BASED LUNG REHABILITATION DEMAND ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者居家肺康复需求问卷,并进行信效度检验。方法以居家肺康复概念为指导,查阅文献并结合14名COPD患者质性访谈的结果构建条目池形成初量表,经过专家咨询、课题组讨论、预实验与正式调查形成正式测试版问卷,并进行信效度检验。结果经探索性因子分析,提取6个公因子,方差累计贡献率为65.88%,共30个条目。Cronbach’sα系数为0.866,问卷总体重测信度系数为0.977;问卷总体水平内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.981,所有条目与问卷总分的相关系数值为0.329~0.573。结论对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者居家肺康复需求问卷具有良好的信效度,可作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者居家肺康复需求的评价工具。 Objective:To develop a home-based lung rehabilitation demand assessment questionnaire and test the reliability and validity of the scale.Methods:Guided by the concept of home lung rehabilitation,we consulted the literature and combined the results of qualitative interviews with 14 COPD patients to build an initial scale of entry pool formation.After expert consultation,research group discussions,pre-experiments and formal surveys,a formal test questionnaire was formed,and the reliability was tested.Results:After exploratory factor analysis,6 common factors were extracted(demand assessment needs,respiratory function training needs,exercise training needs,psychological needs,health education content needs,and home lung rehabilitation acquisition form requirements).The cumulative variance contribution rate was 65.88%,with 30 entries.The Cronbach’sαcoefficient is 0.866,and the overall retest reliability coefficient of the questionnaire is 0.977.The overall level content validity index(S-CVI)of the questionnaire was 0.981.The correlation coefficients between all the items and the total score of the questionnaire were 0.329~0.573.Conclusion:The home lung rehabilitation needs questionnaire for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has good reliability and validity, and can beused as an assessment tool for home lung rehabilitation needs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease.
作者 方慧 刘贤亮 陈蕾 施雁 FANG Hui;LIU Xian-liang;CHEN Lei;SHI Yan(Tenth People’s Hospital of Shanghai,Shanghai 200072,China;School of Nursing,Jinggangshan University,Ji’an,Jiangxi 343009,China)
出处 《井冈山大学学报(自然科学版)》 2021年第2期89-93,共5页 Journal of Jinggangshan University (Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71864019)。
关键词 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 肺康复 需求 量表 信度 效度 COPD pulmonary rehabilitation demands scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献38

  • 1李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:477
  • 2GOLD Executive Committee. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( Revised 2011 ). www. goldeopd, com. 被引量:1
  • 3Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518. 被引量:1
  • 4Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135. 被引量:1
  • 5Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575. 被引量:1
  • 6Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22. 被引量:1
  • 7Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293. 被引量:1
  • 8Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385. 被引量:1
  • 9Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197. 被引量:1
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497. 被引量:1

共引文献2205

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部