摘要
挪用公款罪向贪污罪的转化问题自前罪确立以来就具有很多争议,两者的核心区别在于行为人是否具有非法占有目的。我国现有的刑事规范对于转化情形的规定属于提示性规定而非对转化犯的创制。“转化”是指行为人犯意的转化。为避免客观或主观归罪,司法实践中对行为人主观目的的判断应重视推定的运用,司法机关应以客观行为为基础、其他基础事实为辅助进行推定。
The problem of the transformation from misappropriating public funds to the crime of corruption is always in disput since the establishment of misappropriating public funds,and whether the criminal has the purpose of illegal possession is the core difference between two crimes.The existing criminal norms in our country which stipulate the transformation situations belong to the rules of presentation rather than the creation of transformed crime."Transformation"refers to the change of mens rea.In order to avoid the situation of objective imputation or subjective imputation in judicial practice,the judgment of the criminal's mens rea should attach importance to the use of presumptions,and the judiciary should make presumptions based on objective behavior and supplemented by other basic facts.
作者
许桂敏
宋晶晶
XU Gui-min;SONG Jing-jing(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhenghzou Henan 450001,China)
出处
《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2021年第1期81-84,88,共5页
Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词
挪用公款罪
贪污罪
非法占有
转化判定
misappropriating public funds
the crime of corruption
illegal possession
the judge of transformation
