摘要
行政约谈在实施中存在“缺位”“越位”以及缺乏实效的困境,在制度上存在立法层次低以及不健全的缺陷。应定位行政约谈为行政事实行为中的非正式行政行为,将行政约谈的类型分为常态的行政约谈与异化的行政约谈;常态的行政约谈包括行政指导型约谈与行政调解型约谈,异化的行政约谈包括行政命令型约谈与行政处罚型约谈。应制定《行政约谈条例》进行统一立法,以“依法约谈”为基本原则,以政府职能边界、约谈对象违法情形、与其他行政行为关系三个标准确定行政约谈的适用范围,构建能够保障约谈对象与公众的知情权、参与权以及行政约谈的实效性与效率的程序制度,将行政命令型约谈、行政处罚型约谈、规制性行政指导型约谈纳入行政救济的范围。
In the implementation of administrative interview,it falls into the predicament of“vacancy”,“offside”and lack of actual effect.There are low level of legist ration and some other defects in the system.Administrative interview should be defined as an informal administrative act in administrative factual act,and the types of administrative interview may be divided into normal administrative interview and dissimilated administrative interview.The normal administrative interview includes the administrative guidance interview and the administrative mediation interview.The alienation administrative interview includes the administrative command interview and the administrative punishment interview.The regulations on administrative interview should be formulated for the uniform legislation,taking“interview according to Law”as the basic principle.The scope of application of administrative interview is determined by three criteria:the boundary of government functions,the illegal situation of the interviewees and the relationship with other administrative acts.Country should build a procedural system that can guarantee the rights of the interviewees and the public to know and participate and the effectiveness and efficiency of administrative interviews.Administrative order-type interview,administrative punishment-type interview and regulatory administrative guidance-type interview should be fallen into the scope of administrative relief.
作者
彭波
PENG Bo(School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China;School of Law,Xinzhou Teachers University,Xinzhou Shanxi 034000,China)
出处
《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第6期95-102,118,共9页
Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“‘放管服’改革背景下行政收费设定范围研究”(19BFX059)。
关键词
行政约谈
行政事实行为
非正式行政行为
法治
administrative interview
administrative factual behavior
informal administrative behavior
ruling by law
