摘要
近年来,新列斐伏尔派的城市学者们提出了星球城市化的概念,将城市化视为一个在所有空间尺度上发生的过程。文章分析了近年来对城市政治生态学文献的评论,这些评论指责该领域的多数成果都专注于研究传统的紧密联系的城市,而不是把城市化作为过程来考察。作为回应,文章回顾了相关文献的方方面面,发现其已经(一直)超越了“城市”概念本身,以考虑人类和非人类因素在不同尺度上将城市与边界外的地方连接起来的各种代谢和循环过程。此外,文章还指出了这些研究路径如何能卓有成效地与星球城市化的研究成果结合起来,用以研究城市化性质的变化以及这些变化的社会生态和政治影响。最后,文章提出,“场域倍数”的方法论对日常实践和生活经验的关注在哪些方面有助于研究不同的城市现象以及这些现象中超出城市本身的联系。
The concept of planetary urbanization has emerged in recent years amongst neo-Lefebvrian urban scholars who see urbanization as a process taking place at all spatial scales.This article analyses recent critiques of the urban political ecology(UPE)literature which argue that much of the work in the field has been guilty of focusing exclusively on the traditional bounded city unit rather than urbanization as a process.In response,the article reviews various strands of the UPE literature which have(always)moved beyond‘the city’to consider the various metabolisms and circulations of humans and non-humans connecting cities with places outside of their borders at a variety of scales.Furthermore,it suggests how these approaches can productively work with the insights of the planetary urbanization literature,in considering both the changing nature of urbanization and also the socio-ecological and political implications of these changes.Finally,the article suggests how the methodological approach of the‘site multiple’and its focus on everyday practices and lived experiences can be useful for researching diverse urban phenomena and their more-than-urban connections.
出处
《鄱阳湖学刊》
2020年第6期37-51,125,共16页
Journal of Poyang Lake
