摘要
一流期刊建设形势下,普通学术期刊实现突破性发展的必然路径是发现自身问题,进行供给侧改革。普通期刊普遍存在着审稿质量不够高、审稿效率偏低的问题。要做好审稿质量控制,须坚持专业性、时效性、稳定性、公正性、引导性、服务性六大原则;以国内外一流期刊为镜鉴,在初审、复审、终审三个环节做实做细做到位,如明晰审稿内容,精准选择审者,完善审稿细节等。审稿质量把控得当,必将产生一连串的后效应:期刊质量稳步提升,稿源质量逐步优化,期刊凝聚力、影响力持续增强,进而为期刊的良性发展和品牌期刊建设夯实基础。
Under the background of first-class journal construction, the inevitable path for general academic journals to achieve breakthrough is to discover their own problems and carry out supply-side reform. The problems of general journals include inefficient manuscript review with inadequate quality. The six principles of professionalism, timeliness, stability, impartiality, guidance, and service should be adhered to for reasonable quality control of manuscript review. Learning from the world-class journals in China and abroad, general journals should go all out and focus carefully on the three stages of manuscript review: the first, second and final review. For example, clarifying the content of the review, selecting reviewers accurately, and improving the details of the review. Appropriate quality control of manuscript review will bring about a series of post effects: the steady improvement in the journal quality, the gradual optimization of sources quality of manuscripts, and the continuous enhancement of journal cohesion and influence, to further lay a solid foundation for the healthy development of journals and the construction of brand journals.
作者
王晶冰
WANG Jing-bing(Journal Center,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan Shanci 030024,China)
出处
《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第6期85-88,共4页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
一流期刊
审稿
质量控制
初审
复审
终审
品牌期刊
first-class journals
manuscript review
quality control
first review
recheck
final review
brand journals
