期刊文献+

大学生深度学习水平差异及影响因素研究 被引量:2

College Students Deep Learning Level:Differences and Influencing Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于CCSS 2016问卷对中国海洋大学学情调查的数据,采用多变量路径分析法探究大学生深度学习水平的差异及相关影响因素,结果发现:学习投入对深度学习发挥重要的中介效应;文科、高年级、母亲受教育水平越高、成长地在城市、对所学专业更感兴趣和更加信任、担任过学生干部、校园满意度高的学生,学习投入更高,深度学习水平也随之提高。为此,学校应进一步激发学生学习热情,提高学生学习动力,加大学习投入;构建支持型校园环境,充分满足学生需求,提高深度学习水平。 Based on the data of CCSS 2016 questionnaire survey on the learning status of the Ocean University of China,a multi-variable path analysis was adopted to explore the differences in the deep learning level of college students and its influencing factors.The results show that study engagement plays an important mediating role in deep learning.The students more engaged in learning are generally those senior-grade liberal arts students,whose mothers are relatively more highly educated,who have grown up in cities,who show more interest and trust in their learning programs,and who have served as student cadres and are more satisfied with their campus.In the meanwhile,their deep learning level is also higher.Therefore,it is necessary to stimulate students learning enthusiasm,improve their learning motivation,enhance their learning engagement,build a supportive campus environment,and fully meet students learning demands so as to improve their level of deep learning.
作者 李修杰 LI Xiujie(Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,Shandong,China)
出处 《扬州大学学报(高教研究版)》 2020年第6期92-97,共6页 Journal of Yangzhou University(Higher Education Study Edition)
关键词 高等教育 深度学习 学习投入 higher education deep learning learning engagement
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1何玲,黎加厚.促进学生深度学习[J].计算机教与学.现代教学,2005(5):29-30. 被引量:1377
  • 2Marton F. and Sa ljo R. On qualitative differences in learning. I Outcome and Process [J]. British Journal of Educa- tional Psychology, 1976 (46). 被引量:1
  • 3Biggs J. B. What do inventories of students learning pro- cess really measures? A theoretical review and clarification [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1993 (63). 被引量:1
  • 4清华大学"全国大学生学习与发展追踪研究"课题NSSE-China2011问卷使用手册[z],2011. 被引量:1
  • 5罗晓燕,陈洁瑜.以学生学习为中心的高等教育质量评估——美国NSSE“全国学生学习投入调查”解析[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(10):50-54. 被引量:75
  • 6王文静.创新的教育研究范式:基于设计的研究[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011.25. 被引量:1
  • 7[美]L·W·安德森等.学习、教学和评估的分类学——布鲁姆教育目标分类学修订版(简缩本)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.58-76. 被引量:1
  • 8Biggs,J.B.,Collis,K.F..Evaluating the Quality of Learning:the SOLO Taxonomy[M].New York:Academic Press,1982. 被引量:1
  • 9Smith,T.W.,Colby,S.A..Teaching for Deep Learning[J].The Clearing House,2007,80(5):205-209. 被引量:1
  • 10李锋.信息技术课程学习评价的理论与方法研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2004.24-29. 被引量:1

共引文献828

同被引文献49

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部