摘要
得益于被害人学的兴起以及客观归责理论的发展,以自我决定权为重要理论依据的被害人自我答责理论获得了广泛应用。不论在实务领域还是在理论研究中,被害人自我答责理论都被广泛应用于被害人危险接受阻却归责问题的解决,但是这一理论适用是存在问题的。被害人自我答责理论的内容有抽象和模糊的弊端,理论内部证成存在逻辑误区,而其混淆答责依据与答责结论,缺乏充分的理论分析过程,导致被害人自我答责仅是一个阻却归责结论,无法提供阻却归责证成路径。被害人危险接受阻却归责问题的解决必须契合被害人危险接受本身的内容特征与理论构造,构建属于其自身的独立的阻却归责体系。
Thanks to the rise of victim learning and the development of the objective imputation theory, the victim’s self-responsibility theory, which is based on the self-determination right, has been widely applied. No matter in the practical field or in the theoretical research, the victim’s self-responsibility theory has been widely used to solve the problem of exclusion imputation of the victim’s acceptance of risk. But there are problems with this theory. The content of the victim’s self-responsibility theory is abstract and fuzzy, and the theory is proved to have logic errors. But it confuses the responsibility basis and responsibility conclusion, lack of sufficient theoretical analysis process, the victim’s self-responsibility is only a conclusion of exclusion imputation, which cannot provide the path of proof of exclusion imputation. The solution to the problem of victim’s acceptance of risk must conform to the content characteristics and theoretical structure of victim’s risk acceptance and construct its own independent exclusion imputation system.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第12期131-140,共10页
Law Science Magazine
关键词
被害人危险接受
自我答责
阻却归责
the victim’s acceptance of risk
self-responsibility
exclusion imputation
