摘要
本文以国家劳动关系治理模式为研究对象,首先构建了一个基于经济发展逻辑的劳动关系治理系统分析框架,进而开发了一个类型学体系,最后通过梳理和比较英国、丹麦、德国和瑞典四国战后劳动关系治理的改革和发展实践,阐释了这一分析框架的有效性。这一新的理论模型将产业关系研究从结构化的系统分析提升至一个动态平衡的视角。该研究表明,产业关系系统中各利益相关者之间的斗争、谈判和合作等博弈过程定义了一个国家的主导经济发展逻辑,并进一步决定了其产业关系治理体系的特征,从而实现了对西方劳动关系理论的建构主义视角的补充。这一模型也加入了全球化时代有关资本主义多样性中“趋同还是趋异”的论争,既突出了不同劳动关系治理体系中的共同要素,也对各国在追求类似目标时制度路径的多样性具有解释力。
This paper focuses on labor relations governance.After establishing a new analytical framework for studying this issue based on the logics of economic development,the authors have developed a typological scheme.They then illustrate the effectiveness of this model by examining and comparing the labor relations governance reforms and practices in the UK,Denmark,Germany and Sweden in the postwar era.The authors call for a constructivist perspective in studying industrial relations systems,finding that the contestation,negotiation and cooperation among different stakeholders of labor relations determine the dominant logic of the development of an economy and further shapes the characteristics of its industrial relations system.The authors also enter into the debates on“the convergence or divergence”within the varieties of capitalism,not only highlighting the commonalities among different industrial relations systems,but also providing an explanation for the diversified institutional approaches across different regimes in their pursuit of similar targets.The authors conclude this paper with a discussion of the implications that this new model holds for understanding the economic development and reform in China.
作者
张皓
李欣
ZHANG Hao;LI Xin
出处
《欧洲研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期24-54,I0003,I0004,共33页
Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金
2017年国家社会科学基金重大课题“‘一带一路’国家劳动与雇佣管制研究”(项目编号:17ZDA041)的阶段性成果。
