期刊文献+

人格特质对年轻驾驶员亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为的影响

Effects of Personality Traits on Young Drivers’Pro-social and Aggressive Driving Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考察年轻驾驶员人格特质对亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为的影响。方法采用亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为量表和人格特质量表对305名年轻驾驶员进行测量。结果男性驾驶员亲社会驾驶行为得分比女性驾驶员高,攻击性驾驶行为得分比女性驾驶员低。男性驾驶员受教育程度、愤怒特质、利他可以解释他们亲社会驾驶行为54.8%的变异,受教育程度、愤怒特质、利他、无规则可以解释他们攻击性驾驶行为54.4%的变异;女性驾驶员利他、无规则可以解释他们亲社会驾驶行为19.8%的变异,利他可以解释他们攻击性驾驶行为7.3%的变异。结论人格特质对男女驾驶员亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为的影响是不同的。 Objective To explore the effects of personality traits on young drivers’pro-social and aggressive driving behaviors.Methods Three hundreds and five young drivers were measured using Pro-social and Aggressive Driving Behavior scale and personality scale.Results Male drivers have higher pro-social driving behavior scores than female drivers and their aggressive driving behavior scores are lower than female drivers.Male drivers’education level,anger trait and altruism could explain 54.8%of the variance in their pro-social driving behavior,while education level,anger trait,altruism and normlessness could explain 54.4%of the variance in their aggressive driving behavior.Female drivers’altruism and normlessness could explain 19.8%of the variance in their pro-social driving behavior,while altruism could explain 7.3%of the variance in their aggressive driving behavior.Conclusion The effects of personality traits on young drivers’pro-social and aggressive driving behavior varied with their gender.
作者 杨泽垠 孙龙 YANG Ze-yin;SUN Long(School of Psychology,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,China)
出处 《人类工效学》 2020年第4期20-23,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ergonomics
基金 辽宁省自然科学基金(LQ2019030)。
关键词 年轻驾驶员 攻击性驾驶行为 人格特质 利他 愤怒特质 受教育程度 变异 traffic engineering bad driving drving safety personality traits young driver pro-social driving behavior aggressive driving behavior gender accidant prevention
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1朱国锋,何存道.驾驶员情绪状态量表信度与效度的初步研究[J].心理科学,2002,25(3):296-299. 被引量:11
  • 2Scialfa C T, Deschenes M C, Ference J,et al. A hazard perception test for novice drivers [ J ]. Accident Analysis Prevention, 2011,43 ( 1 ) :204-208. 被引量:1
  • 3Borowsky A, Shinar D, Oron - Gilad T. Age, skill, and hazard percep- tion in driving[J]. Accident Analysis Prevention, 2010,42 ( 4 ) : 1240- 1249. 被引量:1
  • 4Taubman - Ben - Ari O, Mikulincer M, Gillath O. The multidimension- al driving style inventory scale construct and validation [ J ]. Accident Analysis Prevention,2004,36 ( 3 ) :323-332. 被引量:1
  • 5Elander J, West R, French D. Behavioral Correlates of Individual Differences in Road Traffic Crash Risk:An Examination of Methods and Findings [ J ]. Psychologi- cal Bulletin,1993,113(2) :279. 被引量:1
  • 6Farah H, Bekhor S, Polus A, et al. A Passing Gap Ac- ceptance Model for Two - Lane Rural Highways [ J ]. Transportmetrica,2009,5 (3) : 159 - 172. 被引量:1
  • 7Constantinescu Z, Marinoiu C, Vladoiu M. Driving Style Analysis Using Data Mining Techniques [ J ]. Interna- tional Journal of Computers Communications and Con- trol,2010,5 (5) :654 - 663. 被引量:1
  • 8Taubman - Ben - Ari O, Mikulincer M, Gillath O. The Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory Scale Con- struct and Validation [ J ]. Accident Analysis & Preven- tion,2004,36 (3) : 323 - 332. 被引量:1
  • 9李红锋.人格和安全态度对汽车驾驶员驾驶行为的影响[C].2009. 被引量:1
  • 10Amett J, Balle Jensert L. Cultural Bases of Risk Behav- ior: Danish Adolescents[ J]. Child Development. 1993, 64(6) :1842 - 1855. 被引量:1

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部