期刊文献+

论阿尔都塞多元决定论的内在矛盾 被引量:2

On the Internal Contradictions of Althusser’s Multi-determinism Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 阿尔都塞对比分析了黑格尔辩证法和马克思辩证法,认为二者的根本区别在于矛盾的多元决定和一元决定,而不是简单的“颠倒”,是内在结构上的不同,是本质的不同。阿尔都塞的多元决定论虽然起到了反对机械的经济决定论的积极作用,但他将经济基础和上层建筑相分离,各自孤立,没有考察经济因素和其他因素的内在联系,而是将各种因素等量齐观。在经济因素“归根到底”的决定作用和矛盾多元决定的关系上模糊不清,用一个神秘的“既与的”主导结构统摄一切因素,各个因素的作用又是随机的,导致结构的变化神秘莫测、不可捉摸,历史成了因素偶然相遇的历史,最终背离了马克思主义,为后马克思主义开辟了道路。 Althusser comparatively analyzed Hegel’s dialectics and Marx’s dialectics,believing that their fundamental difference lies in the contradictory of plural decision and the unitary decision,rather than the simple“inversion”,which is the internal structural difference and the essential difference.Although Althusser’s pluralistic determinism played a positive role in opposing mechanical economic determinism,he separated the economic base from the superstructure,isolated each other,did not examine the internal relationship between economic factors and other factors,but equated all kinds of factors.In the final analysis,the decisive role of economic factors and the relationship between contradictory and pluralistic decisions are ambiguous.A mysterious dominant structure dominates all factors,and the role of each factor is random,which leads to mysterious and unpredictable structural changes.History has become the history of accidental encounters of factors,and eventually deviates from Marxism and becomes post-Marxism.
作者 崔德凯 CUI De-kai(Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080,China)
出处 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2020年第7期9-14,共6页 Journal of Harbin University
关键词 阿尔都塞 多元决定 辩证法 Althusser multiple decisions dialectics
  • 相关文献

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部