期刊文献+

不同剂量体外冲击波治疗膝骨性关节炎近期疗效比较 被引量:26

Comparison of early clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in different energy flux densities for moderate knee osteoarthritis
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]比较不同能流密度的体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)早中期膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)的近期临床疗效,探索最佳ESWT治疗剂量。[方法]将150个患有骨性关节炎的膝关节分为A、B、C、D、E五组,均使用ESWT治疗4周,各组的能流密度分别为0.06、0.10、0.14、0.18、0.22 mJ/mm^2。分别在治疗前、治疗后1个月及治疗后12个月,进行肢体活动疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)、Lysholm评分和WOMAC骨关节炎指数评分评价临床疗效。[结果]按时间点比较,各组VAS和WOMAC评分治疗前最高,治疗后1个月降至最低,而在治疗后12个月再次升高(P<0.05),然而,各组Lysholm评分治疗前最低,治疗后1个月最高,治疗后12个月再次降低(P<0.05)。按组间比较观察,治疗前各组患膝的VAS、Lysholm和WOMAC评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗1个月后和治疗12个月后,VAS与WOMAC评分由低到高依次为:D组<C组<B组<E组<A组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);相反,Lysholm评分由高到低依次为:D组>C组>B组>E组>A组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]中低能量的ESWT能有效地缓解早中期KOA患者的疼痛症状并改善关节功能,采用能流密度为0.18 mJ/mm^2,近期临床疗效最佳。 [Objective]To explore the best dosage of extracorporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT)for moderate knee osteoarthritis by comparison of the short-term clinical outcomes with different energy flux density of ESWT.[Methods]A total of 150 knees with moderate osteoarthritis were included into this study,and divided equally into five groups,the A,B,C,D and E groups,which received ESWT for 4 weeks with the energy flux density of 0.06 mJ/mm^2,0.10 mJ/mm^2,0.14 mJ/mm^2,0.18 mJ/mm^2 and 0.22 mJ/mm^2 respectively.The visual analogue scale(VAS)for knee pain,Lysholm score and WOMAC osteoarthritis index score were used to evaluate the clinical conditions before treatment,1 month and 12 months after treatment.[Results]In term of comparison among time points,the VAS and WOMAC score were at the highest before treatment,significantly declined to the lowest at 1 month after treatment,and then rose again to the middle at 12 months,conversely,the Lysholm scores were at the lowest before treatment,significantly increased to the highest at 1 month after treatment,and decreased again to the middle at 12 months after treatment in all the 5 groups,which were of statistical significance(P<0.05).Although no statistically significant differences were noticed regarding the VAS,Lysholm and WOMAC scores among the 5 groups before treatment(P>0.05),the VAS and WOMAC scores ranked down-up as D group<C group<B group<E group<A group,whereas the Lysholm score arranged updown as D group>C group>B group>E group>A group,with statistical differences among the 5 groups at 1 month and 12 months after treatment(P<0.05).[Conclusion]The ESWT in medium and low energy flux density do effectively relieve pain and improve joint function for moderate knee osteoarthritis.By comparison,the energy flux density of 0.18 mJ/mm^2 is the best dosage of ESWT for moderate knee osteoarthritis.
作者 刘搏宇 李宏宇 席立成 黄思城 韦明照 王宏润 LIU Bo-yu;LI Hong-yu;XI Li-cheng;HUANG Si-cheng;WEI Ming-zhao;WANG Hongrun(Orthopedic Department,Liuzhou Worker's Hospital,Fourth Affiliated Hospital,Guangxi Medical University,Liuzhou 545005,China;Orthopedic Department,Guangxi Orthopedics Hospital,Nanning 530021,China;Orthopedic Department,People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Nanning 530021,China)
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第11期908-912,共5页 Orthopedic Journal of China
基金 2016年度广西医疗卫生适宜技术开发与推广应用项目(编号:S201643) 2015年度广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科攻1598012-10) 2013年度广西医疗卫生适宜技术研究与开发项目(编号:S201313-05)。
关键词 体外冲击波治疗 能流密度 骨性关节炎 extracorporeal shock wave therapy energy flux density knee osteoarthritis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Arthritis Rheum, 2000, 43: 1905-1915. 被引量:1
  • 2Schnitzer TJ, American College of Rheumatology. Update of ACR guidelines for osteoarthritis: role of the coxibs. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2002, 23(4 Suppl): S24-34. 被引量:1
  • 3Hochberg MC, Ahman RD, Brandt KD, et al. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part Ⅱ. Osteoarthritis of the knee. American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38:1541-1546. 被引量:1
  • 4Hochberg MC, Ahman RD, Brandt KD, et al. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part Ⅰ. Osteoarthritis of the hip. American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38: 1535-1540. 被引量:1
  • 5Simon LS, Lipman AG, Jacox AK, eds. Pain in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile chronic arthritis. 2nd ed. Glenview (IL): American Pain Society (APS), 2002. 179. 被引量:1
  • 6Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis, 2007, 66: 377-388. 被引量:1
  • 7Zhang W, Doherty M. EULAR recommendations for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a critique of the methodology. Br J Sports Med, 2006, 40: 664-669. 被引量:1
  • 8Pendleton A, Arden N, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis, 2000, 59: 936-944. 被引量:1
  • 9Zhang W, Doherty M, Arden N, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis, 2005, 64: 669-681. 被引量:1
  • 10Chevalier X, Marre JP, de Butler J, et al. Questionnaire survey of management and prescription of general practitioners in knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with 2000 EULAR recommendations. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2004, 22: 205-212. 被引量:1

共引文献1995

同被引文献302

引证文献26

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部