摘要
目前,认罪认罚案件证明标准适用问题在理论和实务中均存在较大分歧,证明标准降低说与同等说展开激烈博弈。需立足"以审判为中心"背景与比较法视域,重新审视认罪认罚从宽制度的立法定位及发展方向。在合理借鉴域外实践经验的基础上,充分考量我国刑事诉讼本土语境与司法诉求,以推动证明标准实践完善。基于职权主义诉讼价值追求,在认罪认罚案件审判阶段的证明标准决不能因庭审程序简化而降低。应坚持证据裁判原则与法定证明标准,充分认识证明标准本身精细化、层次化构造之独立价值,以及在不同类型、阶段中可能被辨识的内涵差异。从体系化角度对证明标准进行合理的"层次化"解构,为认罪认罚各阶段证据认定提供指引,完善具体实践运用之层次化、类型化、精准化逻辑。
At present,the issue of application of the standard of proof in cases of confession and punishment is greatly divergent in theory and practice. There is a fierce game between the theory of proof reduction and the theory of equality. It is necessary to re-examine the legislative orientation and development direction of leniency system of confession and punishment based on the "trial as the center"background and the perspective of the Comparative Law. On the origin of reasonably drawing on the practical experience outside China,we should fully consider the local context and judicial appeal of China’s criminal proceedings,so as to improve the practice of the standard of proof. In view of the pursuit of authoritarian litigation,the standard of proof in the trial stage must not be reduced because of the simplification of the trial procedure.We should adhere to the principle of evidence adjudication and the standard of statutory proof,and fully understand the independent value of the refined and hierarchical structure of the standard of proof,as well as the difference of connotation that may be identified in different types and stages. From the perspective of systematization,a reasonable "hierarchical"deconstruction of the standard of proof is provided to guide the evidence identification in each stage of confession and punishment,and to improve the hierarchical,typed and precise logic of concrete practical application.
作者
张俊
汪海燕
ZHANG Jun;WANG Hai-yan
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期77-88,共12页
Northern Legal Science
关键词
认罪认罚
证明标准
以审判为中心
证据裁判
confession and punishment
standard of proof
trial as the center
evidence adjudication
