摘要
刑事速裁程序证明标准在规范和实践中出现分离,司法实践中的刑事速裁证明标准实质上低于规范中的证明标准。这种分离与庭审虚化带来的证明方法不足、公诉证明标准的扩张适用以及不当的司法改革政绩追求有关。刑事速裁程序证明标准的降低具有不可避免性。设置分层次的刑事速裁证明标准,对被告人供述自愿性的证明须达至"排除合理怀疑"的程度,其他犯罪事实和量刑事实证明达至"大致的心证"即可。
There are different proof standards of the criminal speedy trial procedure in the law text and judicial practice. The proof standard of the criminal speedy trial procedure in the law text is lower than that of the judicial practice,which arises from the limited proof methords,the wider application of the proof standards of prosecution,and competition of achievement of judicial reforms. However,the lower proof standard fits for of the criminal speedy trial procedure. The proof standard of voluntary confession is beyond reasonable doubt,and the proof standard of other facts could be approximately believed.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期104-111,共8页
Legal Forum
基金
南开大学亚洲中心资助项目"刑事速裁程序实证研究"(AS1602)的阶段性成果
关键词
刑事速裁程序
证明标准
庭审虚化
the criminal speedy trial procedure
proof standard
nominalization of court trials
