期刊文献+

尿沉渣分析仪和尿干化学分析仪联合检测对尿路感染的诊断价值 被引量:6

Diagnostic Value of Combined Detection of Urine Sediment Analyzer and Urine Dry Chemical Analyzer for Urinary Tract Infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨尿沉渣分析仪和尿干化学分析仪联合检测对尿路感染的诊断价值。方法:167例尿路感染患者均行尿沉渣分析和尿干化学法进行检查,分析细菌培养结果与亚硝酸盐阳性检出情况,分析两种方法单纯检测与联合检测的诊断效能。结果:①细菌培养结果:162例尿标本中培养结果阳性79例,阳性率为48.8%。其中大肠埃希菌52例,占65.8%;金黄色葡萄球菌7例,占8.9%;铜绿假单胞菌5例,占6.3%;肺炎克雷伯菌5例,占6.3%;粪肠球菌4例,占5.1%;链球菌4例,占5.1%;鲍曼不动杆菌1例,占12.7%;产气肠杆菌1例,占12.7%。②亚硝酸盐阳性检出率:尿沉渣分析仪检出亚硝酸盐阳性率为52.5%,尿干化学分析仪为50.0%,尿沉渣分析仪+尿干化学分析仪为54.9%,三种检测方法差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③诊断效能比较:尿沉渣分析仪的灵敏度为70.9%、特异性为78.5%、阳性预测值为71.5%、阴性预测值为62.4%、准确率为70.8%。尿干化学分析仪的分别为72.7%、76.3%、73.6%、56.3%、69.4%。尿沉渣分析仪+尿干化学分析仪分别为77.3%、84.6%、83.8%、73.1%、84.7%。结论:尿沉渣分析仪联合尿干化学分析仪能够大大提高尿路感染的诊断准确性,临床应用价值高。 Objective:To explore the diagnostic value of the combined detection of urine sediment analyzer and urine dry chemical analyzer for urinary tract infection.Methods:All 167 patients with urinary tract infection were examined by urine sediment analysis and urinary dry chemistry.The results of bacterial culture and positive detection of nitrite were analyzed.The diagnostic efficiency of the two methods of simple detection and combined detection was analyzed.Results:①Bacterial culture results:79 cases were positive in 162 urine samples,the positive rate was 48.8%.Among them,52 were Escherichia coli,accounting for 65.8%;7 were Staphylococcus aureus,accounting for 8.9%;5 were Pseudomonas aeruginosa,accounting for 6.3%;5 were Klebsiella pneumoniae,accounting for 6.3%;4 cases,accounting for 5.1%;4 cases of streptococci,accounting for 5.1%;1 case of Acinetobacter baumannii,accounting for 12.7%;1 case of Enterobacter aerogenes,accounting for 12.7%.②The positive detection rate of nitrite:the positive rate of nitrite detected by the urine sediment analyzer is 52.5%,the urine dry chemical analyzer is 50.0%,the urine sediment analyzer+urine dry chemical analyzer is 54.9%,three kinds of detection The difference in methods was not statistically significant(P>0.05).③Diagnostic efficacy comparison:the sensitivity of the urine sediment analyzer is 70.9%,the specificity is 78.5%,the positive predictive value is 71.5%,the negative predictive value is 62.4%,and the accuracy rate is 70.8%.The urine dry chemical analyzers were 72.7%,76.3%,73.6%,56.3%,and 69.4%.Urine sediment analyzer+urine dry chemical analyzer were 77.3%,84.6%,83.8%,73.1%,84.7%.Conclusion:Urine sediment analyzer combined with urinary dry chemical analyzer can greatly improve the diagnostic accuracy of urinary tract infection and has high clinical value.
作者 仇爽 QIU Shuang(Department of Laboratory,Donggang Central Hospital,Liaoning Donggang 118300)
出处 《中国医疗器械信息》 2020年第10期107-108,共2页 China Medical Device Information
关键词 尿沉渣分析仪 尿干化学分析仪 尿路感染 urine sediment analyzer urinary dry chemical analyzer urinary tract infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1冠丽筠,陈宏础.临床基础检验学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1989,10:136. 被引量:3
  • 2Rita De R, Shamanta G, Graziano B. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection [J]. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2010, 411(15):1137-1142. 被引量:1
  • 3Graham J C, Galloway A. The laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract in- fection[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2001,54(12) :911 -919. 被引量:1
  • 4Zaman Z, Roggeman S, Verhaegen J. Unsatisfactory performance of flow cytometer UF-100 and urine strips in predicting outcome of urine cultures [ J ]. J Clin Microbiol,2001,39( 11 ) :4169-4171. 被引量:1
  • 5Kim SY, Kim Y J, Lee SM, at al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 urine cell analyzer as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urinary tract infection [ J ]. Am J Clin Patho1,2007,128 (6) : 922-925. 被引量:1
  • 6Manoni F, Fornasiero L, Ercolin M, et al. Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine flow cyto- meter Sysmex UF-IO00i in urinary tract infections [ J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2009,65 (2) :103- 107. 被引量:1
  • 7Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, et al. Evaluation of the Sys- mex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infec- tion[ J]. Am J Clin Pathol,2010,133 (4) :577-582. 被引量:1
  • 8Lunn A, Holden S, Boswell T, et al. Automated microscopy, dipsticks and the diagnosis of urinary tract infection [ J ]. Arch Dis Child, 2010,95 ( 3 ) : 193-197. 被引量:1
  • 9Broeren MA, Bahceci S, Vader HL, et al. Screening for urinary tract infection with the Sysmex UF-IO00i urine flow cytometer[ J ]. J Clin Microbiol,2011,49 ( 3 ) : 1025-1029. 被引量:1
  • 10Coswamir, Bales, Tejaswis,et al. Prevalenceofuri-narytractinfection and renal scars in patients with diabetic mellitus[J]. Diabete Res Clinpract,201X , 53(3) : 181-183. 被引量:1

共引文献63

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部