期刊文献+

经伤椎内固定对胸腰段脊柱骨折复位效果及椎管侵占率的影响 被引量:4

Effect of Cross-Vertebral Internal Fixation on the Reduction of Thoracolumbar Spinal Fractures and the Spinal Canal Invasion Rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究探讨经伤椎内固定对胸腰段脊柱骨折复位效果及椎管侵占率的影响。方法选取2014年5月至2018年5月泗阳县人民医院骨科收治的114例胸腰段脊柱骨折患者作为研究对象,并按照随机数表法将其随机分为观察组(59例)与对照组(55例),其中观察组患者采用经伤椎内固定治疗,对照组患者采用跨伤椎内固定治疗,对比两组患者手术相关指标及矢状位Cobb角、伤椎前缘高度和椎管侵占率变化情况。结果观察组患者手术时间明显长于对照组(t=4.011,P=0.000),术中出血量明显多于对照组(t=11.470,P=0.000),首次下床时间及住院时间与对照组无明显差异(P均>0.05);术后3、6、12个月观察组患者矢状位Cobb角均明显小于对照组(t=30.600、34.820、27.130,P均=0.000),伤椎前缘高度均明显大于对照组(t=19.150、25.130、27.930,P均=0.000),椎管侵占率均明显低于对照组(t=22.080、20.680、23.000,P均=0.000)。结论与跨伤椎内固定相比,经伤椎内固定能够更好地重建椎体生理高度,降低椎管侵占率,矫正脊柱畸形,恢复脊柱正常解剖结构,临床应用价值较高。 Objective To explore the effect of cross-vertebral internal fixation on the reduction of thoracolumbar spinal fractures and spinal canal invasion rate.Methods 114 patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures,admitted to the Department of Orthopedics,People’s Hospital of Siyang from May 2014 to May 2018,were selected as research subjects and then divided,according to random number table,into an observation group(59 cases) and a control group(55 cases).Patients in the observation group were treated with cross-vertebral internal fixation while patients in the control group were treated with by-vertebral internal fixation.Surgery-related indicators,Cobb angle in sagittal plane,the height of vertebral anterior edge and spinal canal invasion rate were compared between the two groups.Results The surgical time in the observation group was significantly longer than the control group(t=4.011,P=0.000),the intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was significantly more in volume than the control group(t=11.470,P=0.000),and no significant difference was observed in time of first ambulation and duration of hospitalization(all P> 0.05);the Cobb angle in sagittal plane in 3,6 and 12 months after surgery in the observation group was significantly smaller than the control group(t=30.600,34.820,27.130,all P=0.000),the vertebral anterior edge in the observation group were significantly higher than the control group(t=19.150,25.130,27.930,all P=0.000),and the spinal canal invasion rate in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group(t=22.080,20.680,23.000,all P=0.000).Conclusion Compared with by-vertebral internal fixation,cross-vertebral internal fixation has its own advantage in reconstructing the physiological height of the vertebral body,reducing spinal canal invasion rate,correcting spinal deformity and restoring normal anatomical structure of spine,so it has higher clinical application value.
作者 李海波 李林东 Li Haibo;Li Lindong(Department of Orthopedics,People’s Hospital of Siyang,Suqian City,Jiangsu 223700,China)
出处 《中国烧伤创疡杂志》 2020年第3期179-182,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
关键词 经伤椎内固定 跨伤椎内固定 胸腰段脊柱骨折 骨折复位 椎管侵占率 Cross-vertebral internal fixation By-vertebral internal fixation Thoracolumbar spinal fracture Fracture reduction Spinal canal invasion rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献96

共引文献135

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部