摘要
无权代理人需依据缔约过失责任向相对人承担责任,同时由于《民法总则》第一百七十一条第三款规定了履行债务的责任形式,实际上也认可了无权代理人合同责任的性质。无论无权代理人是否存在过错,相对人都可以依据该规则请求其履行债务。但是,如果相对人依缔约过失责任主张损害赔偿,需证明无权代理人存在过错。相对人的主观状态影响无权代理人的责任形式和责任范围,无权代理人赔偿范围的确定也应当依据其责任性质进行判断。在相对人主张损害赔偿责任时,赔偿的范围应当限于信赖利益。
The unauthorized agent is liable to the counterpart according to culpa in contrahendo.At the same time,as paragraph 3 of article 171 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law stipulates the form of liability for the performance of the obligation,the General Provisions of the Civil Law of China actually recognizes the nature of the contractual liability of the unauthorized agent.Whether the agent is at fault or not,the counterpart can request the unauthorized agent to perform the obligation according to the rule.However,if the counterpart claims damages according to culpa in contrahendo,he needs to prove the fault of the unauthorized agent.The state of mind of the counterpart affects the form and scope of liability of the unauthorized agent,and the determination of the scope of compensation of the unauthorized agent should also be judged according to the nature of liability.When the counterpart claims the liability of damage compensation,the scope of compensation should be limited to the reliance interest.
出处
《河南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期16-24,共9页
Henan Social Sciences
关键词
无权代理
缔约过失
信赖利益
Unauthorized Agency
Culpa in Contrahendo
Reliance Interest
