期刊文献+

党政合设合署与行政诉讼制度的回应 被引量:18

Problems and Countermeasures of Administrative Litigation System after the Partial Combination and Joint Office of Party Organs and Governmental Agencies
原文传递
导出
摘要 党政合设合署是中共中央2018年2月明确提出的机构改革举措。当下,这一改革已经展开。此次改革中党政合设合署的范围有限,今后也不可能大量出现党的机构直接、独立行使国家行政管理职权的现象,但并不排除此类现象的发生。党政合设合署后行政权力的行使主体可能更为强势,也会带来党的机构在行使行政管理权的同时如何做到权责统一的问题。为此,需要将党的机构以其加挂或保留的行政机关的名义作为行政诉讼中的适格被告,将其进行实质行政、直接影响相对人权益的行为纳入行政诉讼的受案范围,并允许将其制定的、被作为行政执法主要依据的规范性文件有限度地纳入附带审查的范围。同时,应按照党的十八届四中全会决定的精神,坚定不移地推进司法改革,确保行政诉讼中法院能够独立公正地行使审判权,以应对更加强势的被告。 In February 2018,the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China initiated the institutional reform measures for the partial combination and joint office of Party organs and governmental agencies.At present,this reform has begun.The scope of the combination of Party organs and governmental agencies in this institutional reform is limited.In future practices,it is impossible for a large number of Party organs to directly and independently exercise the state administrative power,but it does not rule out the occurrence of such phenomenon.Moreover,those who exercise the executive power after the institutional reform may be more powerful.The problem of how to integrate power and responsibility during the exercise of state andministrative power by party organs shall also need to be resolved.Therefore,it is required that the administrative agency which the Party organ is added to or retains should be the proper defendant in administrative litigation.The administrative actions made by the Party organs which in the substantive sense directly affect the rights and interests of administrative counterpart should be included in the scope of administrative litigation.The normative documents formulated by the Party organs used as the main basis of administrative enforcement should be included in the scope of incidental review in administrative litigation at a limited scale.At the same time,in accordance with the spirit of the decision of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee,we should firmly promote judicial reform to ensure that the court can exercise judicial power independently and impartially in administrative litigation so as to cope with the more powerful defendants.
作者 黄先雄 Huang Xianxiong
机构地区 中南大学法学院
出处 《中外法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期303-318,共16页 Peking University Law Journal
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“党政合设、合署背景下的行政法基本问题研究”(项目编号:18ZDA148)阶段性成果 法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台建设阶段性成果。
关键词 党政合设 党政合署 行政诉讼 名义被告 Partial Combination of Party Organs and Governmental Agencies Joint Office of Party Organs and Governmental Agencies Administrative Litigation Nominal Defendant
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献131

同被引文献263

引证文献18

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部