期刊文献+

如何科学地审视新冠肺炎疫情中的社会新闻——基于科学论证的分析框架 被引量:11

How to Scientifically Examine the Social News about COVID-19:An Analytical Framework Study Based on Scientific Argumentation
原文传递
导出
摘要 从科学论证的角度深入分析新型冠状病毒感染肺炎疫情中两则具有广泛社会影响力的新闻,指出此次疫情中社交平台上广泛传播的社会科学类信息中存在不同程度的科学论证结构问题。分析表明,科学论证作为一种论证工具可以帮助公众对信息进行理性审思,提升公众的批判性思维能力,并提出以科学论证为途径的面向不同人群的科学素养提升建议。 This study analyzed two cases of science news of wide social influence from the perspective of scientific demonstration,and pointed out that there are different problems of scientific argumentation structure in social science reports.The analysis of this paper shows that scientific argumentation,as a tool of reasoning,can help people think rationally about information and improve people’s critical thinking.Moreover,this paper puts forward specific suggestions for different groups,such as the public,mass media,scientists and others so as to enhance the scientific literacy of the nation.
作者 严晓梅 李心怡 王晶莹 郑永和 Yan Xiaomei;Li Xinyi;Wang Jingying;Zheng Yonghe(Research Institute of Science Education in Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
出处 《科普研究》 2020年第1期11-18,26,104,共10页 Studies on Science Popularization
基金 中国科学院院士咨询项目“我国科学教育发展战略研究”北京师范大学子课题“科学素养”(2018-Z10-A-025)。
关键词 科学论证 科学素养 社会科学性议题 scientific argumentation scientific literacy social scientific issues
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1刘韵,张红燕.论辩模式的修辞价值理论在新闻语篇中的应用——对“朝核问题”相关报道的剖析[J].科教文汇,2007(04S):165-166. 被引量:1
  • 2Osborne J. Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science,2010,328(4): 463-466. 被引量:1
  • 3Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M. et al.Learning to Read Scientific Text: Do Elementary School Commercial Reading Programs Help? Science Education, 2008,92(5):765-798. 被引量:1
  • 4Kuhn D. Science asArgument:Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking. Science education, 1993,77(3): 319-337. 被引量:1
  • 5Driver, R., Newton, P. et al. Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 2000,84 (3):287-313. 被引量:1
  • 6Romberg. T. A., Carpenter, T. P. Research on Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Two Disciplines of Scientific Enquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.),New York: Macmillan, 1986:605-629. 被引量:1
  • 7Hake R. R. Interactive-engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-thousand-student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses American Journal of Physics, 1998,66(1):64-74. 被引量:1
  • 8Schwarz B.B., Neuman Y., et al. Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together! Cognition and Instruction, 2000,18(4):461-494. 被引量:1
  • 9Ames G. J., Murray F.B. When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Promoting Cognitive Change by Social Conflict. Developmental Psychology, 1982,18(6):894-897. 被引量:1
  • 10Zohar A., Nemet F. Fostering Students' Knowledge and Argumentation Skills through Dilemmas in Human Genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2002,39(1):35-62. 被引量:1

共引文献74

同被引文献51

引证文献11

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部