摘要
目的基于院校影响因素理论模型,探究影响学术型临床医学博士生科研能力与综合素养的关键影响因素。方法采用定性与定量结合的研究模式,对某“双一流”建设高校附属医院256名学术型临床医学博士生展开调查。结果通过回归分析,发现课程和科研训练、情感支持、导师指导、学术生态硬环境和学术生态软环境对博士生能力与素养产生显著性影响关系(F=45.83,P<0.001),学术型临床医学博士生的科研能力与综合素养在年级、性别、年龄、生源、培养类型、培养环境等不同特征下差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论基于培养过程视角设立的5个影响因素维度是影响学术型临床医学博士生科研能力与综合素养的关键因素,有助于提升临床医学博士生的培养质量。
Objective Based on the Methodology of Research on College Impact,this case explores the key influencing factors affecting the scientific research ability and comprehensive literacy of clinical medical doctoral students of academic.Methods The research object used qualitative and quantitative research methods to conduct empirical research by selecting 256 clinical doctoral studentsof academicat anaffiliated hospital of a"Double World-Class University".Results The academic research ability and literacy of clinical medical doctoral studentsof academic had significant differences under different characteristics,such as grade,gender,age,birthplace,training type,and training environment.Regression results showed that"course and scientific research training","emotional support factors"and"academic ecological soft environment"had impact on the scientific research ability and literacy of clinical medical doctoral studentsof academic.The degree of interpretation of the model was statistically significant(F=45.83,P<0.001).Conclusion From the perspective of the cultivation process,there are five key factors affecting the ability and literacy of clinical doctoral studentsof academic.Improving the ability and literacy of clinical medical doctoral students will help to improve the quality of cultivation.
作者
施恋
侯长荣
冯达
冯占春
SHI Lian;HOU Changrong;FENG Zhanchun(Graduate Management Department of Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,430030,China)
出处
《中国社会医学杂志》
2020年第1期27-30,共4页
Chinese Journal of Social Medicine
基金
华中科技大学“双一流”建设国际合作专项(一带一路沿线国家医学教育比较)
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(71673098)
关键词
博士研究生
临床医学
研究生教育
科研能力
培养质量
Doctoral studentof academic
Clinical medicine
Graduate education
Scientific research ability
Quality of education
