摘要
“大理论”与“后理论”的交锋,由于齐泽克、诺埃尔·卡罗尔、波德维尔在各自学科的重要地位,受到英语学界的关注。作为学术史的后来者,“后理论”从概念的含混模糊、理论暧昧的政治立场、否定真实观、同质化的结论、研究方法等六个方面对“大理论”进行尖锐批判。齐泽克作为拉康的“当代传人”,积极回应了卡罗尔、波德维尔的质疑,但他在论述剪辑、景深、缝合及其凝视的反批评中,出现焦点散乱、论题后撤、论证乏力等诸多缺陷。就电影理论研究而言,最为迫切的是反思齐泽克等大理论家们电影研究的意义。质言之,如果所分析的问题是一种与电影实际状况毫不相干,甚至悖逆于基本事实的先验预设,那么,其学术价值就大打折扣了。
Because of the important position of Zizek,Noёl Carroll and David Bodwell in their respective disciplines,the confrontation between“Grand Theory”and“Post Theory”has attracted the attention of the English academia.As a latecomer of academic history,Carroll and Bodwell,which belong to“Post Theory”,criticized the“Grand Theory”from six aspects:the ambiguity of the concept,the ambiguous political position of the theory,the denial of the concept of truth,the conclusion of homogenization,and the research method.Zizek,as Lacan’s“contemporary successor”,responded to the criticism.However,in his counter-criticism discussions on editing,depth of focus,stitching and gaze,there are many defects,such as the confusion of focus,the retreat of thesis and the weakness of argumentation.As far as the study of film theory is concerned,the most urgent thing is to rethink on the significance of film study of theorists such as Zizek.In short,if the problems analyzed are only theoretical possibilities and transcendental presuppositions,but have nothing to do with the actual situation of the film,or even go against the film’s basic facts,then its academic value will be greatly reduced.
出处
《学术研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期159-167,178,共10页
Academic Research
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“中国电影文化竞争力与海外动态数据库建设”(19ZDA271)的阶段性成果
