摘要
在“日常业务规则”视角下,《公司法》第16条将担保排除出法定代表人的概括代理范围。在公司担保中,法定代表人的签章无法独立承担起对外表示公司意志之职责。欲使公司受担保合同的约束,相对人还应证明,法定代表人的代表权得到填补的外观,以及其有正当理由信赖法定代表人的代表权得到了填补。法院应当综合考虑法定代表人进行投机行为造成的破坏程度和债权人进行审查所须付出的成本,对不同的债权人课以不同形态的审查义务。
Guarantee is beyond corporate ordinary business.Article 16 of Company Act excludes guarantee from the default authorities of legal representative.Signature of legal representative by itself cannot represent corporate will.In order to regulate warrantor by guarantee contract,counterpart must prove these facts.First,the appearance of the legal representative’s right of representation being filled.Second,he trusts that legal representative’s right of representation has been filled in due course.Otherwise,theorem of unauthorized agency shall be applied.The court shall impose different forms of examination obligations on different creditors,taking into account the extent of damage caused by the speculation conducted by the legal representative and the cost incurred by the creditor.
作者
梁泽宇
LIANG Ze-yu(Law School,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
2019年第6期18-32,共15页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
公司担保
法定代表人权限
日常业务规则
审查义务
相对人善意
corporate guarantee
authority of legal representative
ordinary business rule
examination obligations
good faith of counterpart
