摘要
转喻是一种基本的认知方式逐渐成为学界共识。但对转喻推理本身(即从转喻源域到目标域的推理过程)的具体操作研究相对较少。结合逻辑学的三大推理模型,分析高、低层转喻的逻辑推理机制,研究发现:由于高、低层转喻本质的显著特征是偶然性,所以属于必然性推理的演绎逻辑与高、低层转喻都无关;高层转喻的推理基础是不完全归纳逻辑;低层转喻的推理基础是溯因逻辑。两者交叉互补,前者强调转喻的认知功能,后者侧重转喻的交际效果。
With the deepening of cognitive metonymy research,metonymy is increasingly recognized as a fundamental way of cognition.However,there is relatively little research targeting the fundamental issue of the metonymy inference itself,i.e.the specific inference process from the metonymic source domain to the target domain.Based on the three inference models of logic,an analysis of the logical reasoning mechanisms of high-and low-level metonymy reveals that:First,because of its contingency nature,metonymy has nothing to do with the truth-preserving deductive reasoning;Secondly,high-level metonymy is based on incomplete inductive logic;Thirdly,the basis of reasoning for lower-level metonymy is abductive logic;Finally,high-level metonymy and lowlevel metonymy complement each other,with the former emphasizing the cognitive function of metonymy,while the latter focusing on the communicative effect of metonymy.
作者
范振强
FAN Zhen-qiang(School of Foreign Languages,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou,310018,China)
出处
《福建江夏学院学报》
2019年第5期82-93,共12页
Journal of Fujian Jiangxia University
基金
国家社科基金项目(19BYY008)
关键词
高层转喻
低层转喻
演绎逻辑推理
归纳逻辑推理
溯因逻辑推理
high-level metonymy
low-level metonymy
deductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
abductive reasoning
