摘要
后人类主义思潮本质上作为当代高技术资本在人类生命相关领域扩张的思想开路先锋,对前沿科技将开创的人类未来可能性给出了极具洞察力的把握和预见,但同时也由于其缺乏对现代技术-资本框架的本质和人的历史性本质更为深刻的追问以及由此形成的自觉的政治意识和政治素养而暴露其形而上学基础的薄弱。他们一般都持有技术自主论思想,同时又信奉技术工具论而无视其间的矛盾,并且无反思地立足于现代主体论形而上学的抽象理性与道德,对通向后人类的复杂社会博弈进程给出过于天真的理解,对需要紧迫予以揭示和澄清的一些重大哲学问题构成遮蔽与耽搁。
As the idea trail blazers of advanced technology and capitals expanding in relevant biospheres of humanity in the contemporary era,posthumanism,while demonstrating a very insightful grasp of and vision into the future possibilities for humanity pioneered by cutting-edge science and technology,has betrayed the weakness and thoughtlessness of its ontological foundation due to its lack of more profound questioning of the nature of the modern techno-capital framework and accordingly its lack of self-conscious political awareness and literacy. Posthumanists often hold both a relatively simple theory of technology autonomy and a vulgar theory of technology instrumentalism without paying attention to the conflicts between the two theories. In addition,basing itself on the abstract rationality and morality of the modern subjectivist metaphysics without reflecting,posthumanism offers a rather na¨lve understanding of the complex social games that lead to post-humans,obscuring and obstructing major problems that demand immediate exposure and exposition.
作者
王志伟
WANG Zhi-wei(School of Philosophy,Fudan University,Shanghai 200434,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第8期35-41,共7页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
后人类主义
奇点
技术观
资本
posthumanism
singularity
approaches to technology
capital
