摘要
2000年以来,“民国大学史”研究构成了大陆学术界的一个重要学术增长点。随着相关论著的不断涌现,“民国大学史”的研究也跳出了既有的研究框架,其关注视角更为新颖、多元,书写范式发生了根本性的转换。从众多著作中撷取若干富有启发式的观点与方法,凝练出一些关键词,即“党国视角”的重新发现与超越“政府—学府”二元对立维度下的大学史研究、大学的“国立化”“地方化”及其所呈现出的“地方性知识”、大学与近代中国的知识生产与学术转型,并以此为导向来勾划出新世纪以来大陆学界“民国大学史”研究的新动向与新取径。同时,也将从视域、理论与材料三个方面对“民国大学史”的研究进行总结与反思。而如何从过去这十多年来的学术进路中,概括出大学史研究的范式更新,并反思如何对既有研究模式有所超越与突破,亦是今后所努力的方向。
Since 2000, the study of the university history of the Republic of China has formed an important academic growth point in the academic circles of the Mainland. With the emergence of relevant research results, the study of the university history of the Republic of China has also jumped out of the existing research framework, and its focus becomes more novel and diverse, and the writing paradigm has undergone a fundamental transformation. This article will draw a number of ideas and methods that have implications from a large number of studies, and condense some key words, namely, the rediscovery of the “party-state perspective” and the research on the university history beyond the dualistic opposition of “government-school”, university’s “nationalization”,“localization” and its “local knowledge”, and the universities and knowledge production and academic transformation in modern China. Based on the above, the article outlines the new trends and approaches in the studies of the university history of the Republic of China in the mainland academic circles. At the same time, the article summarizes and reflects on the studies of the university history of the Republic of China from the aspects of perspective, theory and materials. How to summarize the paradigm trend of the university history research from the past academic experience, and to reflect on how to transcend and break through the existing research model, are also the goals of this article.
作者
丁乙
DING Yi(Department of History,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处
《教育学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期113-128,共16页
Journal of Educational Studies
关键词
“民国大学史”
“党国视角”
知识生产
地方性经验
范式更新
“the university history of the Republic of China”
“the perspective of the party state”
knowledge production
local experience
paradigm renewal
