摘要
"党内法规严于国家法律"是党规国法关系的具体表达,但现有观点却缺少对"党内法规严于国家法律"合理性的理论阐释。从已有观点来看,对"党内法规严于国家法律"的解释理由主要集中在党员入党行为的自愿同意、党组织与党员之间的特别权力关系、中国共产党的性质与先进性追求、党员行为的志愿性与自觉性、党员权利的获利属性。通过对上述观点的理论归类与反思,发现"党内法规严于国家法律"的根本依据在于党员的自愿与同意行为,即党员对自身基本权利的主观放弃。但基本权利放弃具有个案性、不可概括性、放弃和放弃行为存在边界等特征,因而同意行为本身也存在理论瑕疵。因此,需要从本质、原则、方法、衡量和保障五个方面提升"党内法规严于国家法律"的正当性与合理性。
"The CPC’s rules are stricter than the national laws" is a concrete expression of the relationship between the CPC’s rules and the national laws,but the existing point of views lack the theoretical interpretation of the rationality of "stricter".From the existing point of view,the explanation for "stricter" mainly focuses on the voluntary consent of party’s members to join the party,special power relations between party and party’s members,the nature and advanced pursuit of CPC,the volunteerism and consciousness of party’s members’ behavior,and the profitability of party’s members’ rights.Through the theoretical classification and reflection of the above viewpoints,it is found that the basis of "stricter" lies in the voluntary and consent behavior of party’s members,that is,the party members’ subjective abandonment of their fundamental rights.However,the abandonment of fundamental rights is characterized by cases,and it is prohibitedto abandon all the rights,also there are restricted boundaries in the behavior of abandonment.Thus,the consent behavior itself also has theoretical flaws.Therefore,it is necessary to improve the legitimacy and rationality of the viewpoint of "the CPC’s rules are stricter than the national laws" from the five aspects of essence,principle,method,measurement and guarantee.
出处
《社会主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期104-111,共8页
Socialism Studies
基金
2014年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“推进党内法治建设理论与实践创新研究”（14ZDC006）
2018年度山东省社会科学规划研究专项立项一般项目“党内法规实施行为实证研究”（18CDCJ30）
关键词
党内法规
国家法律
同意理论
基本权利放弃
正当性阐释
Inner-Party Regulation
Natinal Law
Consent Theory
Abandonment of Fundamental Rights
Legitimate Interpretation
