摘要
监察机关行使职务犯罪调查权与检察机关履行职务犯罪审查起诉权之间呈现彼此分离又有交集的互动关联。虽然《监察法》明文规定涉嫌职务犯罪的被调查人主动认罪认罚、符合特定情形会获得监察机关从宽处罚的建议,然而,对于此种从宽处罚建议的具体模式以及在审查起诉阶段的后续处遇,《监察法》与《刑事诉讼法》都未曾明确涉及,为司法实践的运用增添难以遮蔽的现实阻滞。在遵循监察基本理念和诉讼制度的前提下,对监察阶段从宽处罚建议的模式选择和后续适用予以深入剖析,实现监察阶段从宽处罚建议与量刑建议之间的顺畅衔接,构筑监察机关从宽处罚建议的整体轮廓与繁简格局。
There is an interactive relationship between the exercise of investigative power by supervisory organs and the exercise of prosecutorial power by procuratorial organs for duty crime. Although the Supervisory Law stipulates that the investigated person of duty crime voluntarily pleads the guilt and punishment and it suit the specific situation, he or she will receive a lenient punishment from the supervisory authority. However, the specific mode and the follow-up at the stage of review and prosecution have not been explicitly covered in the Supervisory Law and the Criminal Procedure Law, it is a difficult obstacle to the application of judicial practice.Under the premise of following the supervision basic concepts and the litigation system, we will deeply analyze the mode selection and follow-up application of the lenient punishment suggestion in the monitoring phase, and realize the smooth connection between the recommendations and the sentencing recommendations, and build a overall outline and pattern of the penalty recommendations for supervisory authority.
作者
石莹
Shi Ying(Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing 401120)
出处
《警学研究》
2019年第4期21-27,共7页
Police Science Research
基金
2018年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“推进国家监察全覆盖研究”的阶段性研究成果，项目编号：18JZD037
关键词
职务犯罪被调查人
认罪认罚
从宽建议
从宽适用
investigated person of duty crime
confession of guilt and punishment
lenient punishment recommendations
lenient punishment application
