期刊文献+

标准化沟通模式在普外科护士病情汇报中的应用 被引量:20

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨基于现况-背景-评估-建议(SBAR)的标准化沟通模式在普外科护士向医师汇报病情中的应用效果。方法成立SBAR小组,设计普外科SBAR病情汇报指引单,并针对SBAR相关内容进行培训。2018年1~6月,上海市第一人民医院普外科11楼病区护士应用SBAR模式向医师汇报患者病情,并对护士及医生进行问卷调查,比较实施SBAR病情汇报模式前后护士的评判性思维能力及医师对护士工作的满意度的差异。结果使用SBAR沟通模式进行病情汇报后,护士评判性思维能力得分(285.86±16.10)分,高于实施前(261.19±9.62)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。医师对护士满意度得分为(95.81±3.34)分,高于实施前的(90.52±3.40)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论SBAR沟通模式能够提高护士的评判性思维能力,促进医护有效合作。
出处 《安徽医学》 2019年第7期826-828,共3页 Anhui Medical Journal
基金 上海市科委课题(项目编号:15411967200)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,陈满辉,白洪海,李守国,李继平,蔡芸芳,王君俏,殷磊.批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(9):644-647. 被引量:1810
  • 2Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory, CCTDI scoring supplement. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 3Facione PA, Facione NC. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1992. 被引量:1
  • 4Ip WY, Lee DTF, Lee IFK, et al. Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(1):84-90. 被引量:1
  • 5Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002, 39(2):123-132. 被引量:1
  • 6Albert RT, Albert RE, Radsma J. Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2002, 18(4):220-229. 被引量:1
  • 7Chan S. The Chinese learner - a question of style. Education and Training, 1999, 41(6/7):294-304. 被引量:1
  • 8Gao G. ''Don't take my word for it.''- understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(2):163-186. 被引量:1
  • 9Biggs J. Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In: Watkins DA, Biggs JB, eds. The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Hong Kong and Australia: CERC and ACER, 1996. 45-67. 被引量:1
  • 10American Philosophical Association. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report: Research findings and recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy(ER 被引量:1

共引文献1871

同被引文献156

引证文献20

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部