期刊文献+

基于试卷分析结果的《护理学基础》课程教学思考 被引量:4

Improvement of Basic Nursing Science teaching based on the results of examination analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析护理本科学生《护理学基础》期末考试试卷,为进一步深化教学改革,提高教学质量提供依据。方法选择某年级80 名护理专业4 年制本科学生期末考试试卷进行统计分析。结果学生考试成绩为(72.04 ±11.18)分,呈正偏态分布,试卷客观题的难度和区分度分别为0.69 和0.23,非客观题的难度和区分度分别为0.72 和0.27,试卷的结构效度为0.23,信度为0.71。结论本套考试试卷的效度、信度较好,区分度较好,但试卷的难度整体偏大,需适当易化,且个别试题的区分度欠佳,需进一步完善和修订。后续还需积极推进教学方法及考试改革,以进一步加强学生临床思维和评判性思维能力培养。 Objective To analyze the end-of-term examination papers for the course Basic Nursing Science in undergraduate nursing students, so as to provide evidence for deepening teaching reform and improving teaching quality. Methods The examination papers from 80 undergraduate nursing students with a 4-year curriculum at the same grade were statistically analyzed. Results The examination scores were 72.04±11.18, showing a positive-skew distribution. The difficulty degree and discrimination index were 0.69 and 0.23 for the objective test questions and 0.72 and 0.27 for non-objective test questions, respectively. The structural validity was 0.23 and the reliability was 0.71. Conclusion The validity and reliability of the examination papers are good, along with good discrimination. However, the difficulty degree is relatively high and needs to be reduced appropriately. The discrimination is poor for a few test questions and needs to be further revised and optimized. It is important to actively promote reform on teaching methods and examination design, so as to further strengthen the clinical thinking and critical thinking of the nursing students.
作者 胡晓林 冯先琼 张凤英 邱楚谨 Hu Xiaolin;Feng Xianqiong;Zhang Fengying(West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China)
出处 《中国医疗管理科学》 2019年第4期37-41,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Medical Management Sciences
基金 四川省科技厅面上项目“华西医学科普创新开发与育人应用研究”(2019JDKP0070) 成都市科技局技术创新项目(2018-YFYF-00122-SN)
关键词 护理学基础教育 试卷分析 教学方法 考试改革 Essential nursing Exam paper analysis Teaching method Examination reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献44

  • 1张琼.试卷质量的分析[J].高教论坛,2004(4):65-67. 被引量:17
  • 2赵立新,陈文艺,郭子君.试卷质量的定量评价[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(4):136-141. 被引量:34
  • 3赵天玉,陈圣滔.考试成绩与试卷质量的分析研究[J].江汉石油学院学报(社科版),2003,(6):93-94. 被引量:3
  • 4殷磊.护理学基础(第3版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.216. 被引量:13
  • 5Potter PA,Perry AG.Fundamentals of nursing.5th ed.St.Louis:Mosby.2001.preface. 被引量:1
  • 6Barbara K,Glenora Erb.Fundamentals of nursing:concepts,process and practice.6th ed.Philadelphia:Prentice Hall Health Upper Saddle River,2000. 被引量:1
  • 7Carol T,Carol L,Priscilla L.Fundamentals of nursing:The art and science of nursing care.3th ed.Philadephia:Lippincott-Raren Publishers.1997.197-414. 被引量:1
  • 8Bond D,Walker D.Promoting reflection in professional courses:The challenge of context.Studies in Higher Education,1998,23:191-214. 被引量:1
  • 9Cantanzaro AM,McMullen KA.Increasing nursing students' spiritual sensitivity.Nurse Educator,2001,26(5):221-226. 被引量:1
  • 10Killeen ML.Nursing fundamentals texts:Where's the ethics? Journal of Nursing Education,1986,25:334-340. 被引量:1

共引文献99

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部