摘要
在行政调查过程中应恪守程序公正,依法对行政调查组织加以合理架构。原则上,在行政调查前,调查人员应事先告知被调查人并表明其身份,通过陈述和申辩程序、听证程序的架构来听取当事人意见。行政调查应秉承职权调查主义的立场,当存在开展事实调查的必要性且存在可调查的事实时,启动事实调查程序并保证证据调查程序的公正性,制作调查记录。行政机关有选择不同行政调查方式的裁量权,但应优先选择成本较低、对当事人侵害程度较低的调查方式。行政调查程序中存在合作行政的空间,可以通过授权或委托的方式,令其他主体实施行政调查,当事人在行政调查程序中应履行协助义务。
Procedure justice plays important role in administrative investigation process, the organization of administrative investigation should be rationalized. Prior notice, identify oneself, hearing, make statements and argue, are essential elements in investigation procedure. When exists the necessity of fact-finding, and exists accessible facts, administrative agency should initiate investigation procedure on its initiative, the investigation procedure should be fair, and make corresponding investigational records. Administrative agencies have the discretion to choose proper investigation methods, but the prefer method is the less restrictive method. Collaborative administration is useful in the development of administrative investigation procedure. Under the delegation or authorization, other actors may carry out administration investigation, interest parties have the obligation to assist administrative agency during investigation process.
出处
《吉林大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期133-142,222,共11页
Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(17BFX004)
关键词
行政调查
职权调查
调查程序
合作行政
当事人协助义务
administrative investigation
investigation by own initiative
investigation procedure
collaborative administration
obligation to assist of interest parties
