摘要
相对人迟延举证是指相对人在行政诉讼过程提出其在行政程序中没有及时提供的证据用以反驳行政主体的决定或是证明自己主张。根据迟延的原因及相对人迟延的主观心态不同,迟延举证可能表现为相对人恶意的证明妨碍或是陈述申辩权的怠于行使,也可能是相对人行使权利客观受阻。应区分迟延举证的不同情形,设置各自相异的诉讼后果,《最高人民法院关于行政诉讼证据若干问题的规定》仅区分两种情形予以规定,显然有嫌粗漏。
The private party＇ s delay in onus probandi means that the private party provides evidence in the administrative litigation procedure which he failed to provide timely in the administrative procedure, aiming at refuting the administrative body＇ s decision or evidencing his own claim. Due to the different delay reason and subjective attitude of the private party, the delay in onus probandi may be because of the private party＇ s malicious obstruction of evidence, negative exercise of the right of statement and defense, or objective hindrance, which should be set up with separate litigation consequence. Consequently, in the Provisions of the Supreme People＇s Court on Several Issues Concerning Evidence in Administrative Litigation, the only two distinctive situations are rather rough.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期95-101,共7页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
行政程序
证据
协力义务
行政诉讼
Administrative Procedure
Evidence
Proof Cooperative Obligation
Administrative Litigation
