摘要
当代民族志出现了被一些西方学者称之为"本体论回归"的取向,其缘由是民族志发展历程中"分裂的对转"逻辑所造成。作为本体论的科学民族志和作为知识论的后现代民族志的内部都包含着一种紧张关系,当新的民族志在对转逻辑中开辟新的路径时,它需要完成对本体论与知识论的双重扬弃与双重承继。这种"本体论回归"民族志的性质是一种新的"对本体论的许诺",即将语言(叙事)作为本体论许诺的核心的民族志,其基本内涵不再是单一的用"客观、科学的观点"与方法去"描述事实"或仅仅是"求知主体对象化",而是当地人自身生活和观念以及民族志者自身生活与观念的双重主体性诉求。
The logic of "the splitting transposition" in the process of ethnography development causes the trend in contemporary ethnography that is called "the regression of ontology" by some western scholars. A tension is contained inside both the ethnography of science as an ontology and the postmodern ethnography as an epistemology. When the new ethnography opens up a new path in the logic of transposition, it needs to complete the dual sublation and dual inheritance of ontology and epistemology. The nature of this ethnography of "regression of ontology" is a new sort of "promise to ontology". In other words, the basic connotation of this ethnography with language (narrative) as the core of promise to ontology is no longer a single description of facts with "objective and scientific" viewpoints and methods or simply "the objectification of the subject of knowledge". Instead, it is the dual appeal of subjectivity of the lives and concepts of both the local people and the ethnographers.
作者
朱炳祥
张佳梅
ZHU Bing-xiang;ZHANG Jia-mei(Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
出处
《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期114-119,共6页
JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION
关键词
本体论回归
分裂的对转
本体论许诺
主体性诉求
the regression of ontology
the splitting transposition
promise to ontology
the appeal of subjectivity
