摘要
侦查中"互相印证"的证明要求源于审判阶段的"印证证明模式",是审判证明模式影响审查起诉进而传导到侦查工作的结果。随着审判中心地位的逐步确立,侦查工作受"印证证明模式"的影响日深,侦查机关为了满足裁判要求而对"互相印证"的偏执,往往导致侦查人员对口供的过度依赖,增大了错案的风险。侦查机关应合理运用印证证明模式,避免侦查人员对证据"相互印证"的不择手段的追求。更为深远地看,则需在审判环节建立起印证证明基础上的裁判者自由心证制度,从根源上缓解侦查中互相印证的压力。
It’s required that verification of "mutual corroboration" in criminal investigation derive from"evidence verification mode"in trial stage, which results from the influence of trial verification mode on review of prosecution and then upon criminal investigation. In the wake of the establishment of trial-centered position,criminal investigation tends to take a deeper impact from"evidence verification mode". The criminal investigation agencies are likely to be overdependent on verbal confessions because of the insistence on"mutual corroboration"somewhat stubbornly required by the judges, which increases the risks of case misjudgment. Therefore, the criminal investigation agencies shall use evidence verification mode reasonably so as to avoid"mutual corroboration"of evidences unscrupulously. From a more far-reaching prospect, it’s advised to establish a free evidence evaluation system based on evidence verification in trial stage, which would relieve the pressure of mutual corroboration during the process of criminal investigation fundamentally.
作者
钟明曦
ZHONG Ming-xi(Fujian Police College, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350007)
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2018年第6期56-62,共7页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基金
2018年教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"大数据侦查的程序规制研究"(18YJA820032)
关键词
侦查
印证证明模式
传导流程
investigation
proof verification method
incentive procedure
